Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 4 |
| Mastery Tests | 4 |
| Test Validity | 4 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
| Academic Ability | 2 |
| Adaptive Testing | 2 |
| Certification | 2 |
| Item Response Theory | 2 |
| Medical Students | 2 |
| Pass Fail Grading | 2 |
| Test Length | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
| Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Graham, Darol L. – 1974
The adequacy of a test developed for statewide assessment of basic mathematics skills was investigated. The test, comprised of multiple-choice items reflecting a series of behavioral objectives, was compared with a more extensive criterion measure generated from the same objectives by the application of a strict item sampling model. In many…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Assessment, Item Sampling
Lunz, Mary E.; And Others – 1991
This paper explores the effect of reviewing items and altering responses on the efficiency of computer adaptive tests (CATs) and the resultant ability measures of examinees. Subjects included 712 medical students: 220 subjects were randomly assigned to the review condition; 492 were randomly assigned to a review control condition (the usual CAT…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Adaptive Testing, Certification, Comparative Testing
Weiss, David J., Ed. – 1980
This report is the Proceedings of the third conference of its type. Included are 23 of the 25 papers presented at the conference, discussion of these papers by invited discussants, and symposium papers by a group of leaders in adaptive testing and latent trait test theory research and applications. The papers are organized into the following…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Academic Achievement, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Bergstrom, Betty A.; Lunz, Mary E. – 1991
The level of confidence in pass/fail decisions obtained with computer adaptive tests (CATs) was compared to decisions based on paper-and-pencil tests. Subjects included 645 medical technology students from 238 educational programs across the country. The tests used in this study constituted part of the subjects' review for the certification…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Certification, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing


