Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Comparative Testing | 16 |
Multiple Choice Tests | 16 |
Test Validity | 16 |
Higher Education | 11 |
Test Items | 8 |
Test Format | 7 |
Test Reliability | 7 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 4 |
Construct Validity | 4 |
Foreign Countries | 4 |
Item Analysis | 4 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Green, Kathy | 2 |
Melancon, Janet G. | 2 |
Thompson, Bruce | 2 |
Albanese, Mark A. | 1 |
Anderson, Paul S. | 1 |
Breland, Hunter M. | 1 |
Dowd, Steven B. | 1 |
Gaynor, Judith L. | 1 |
Hyers, Albert D. | 1 |
Kent, Thomas H. | 1 |
Kimmel, Rumena | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 14 |
Journal Articles | 10 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 7 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Audience
Location
Canada | 2 |
Germany | 1 |
Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Embedded Figures Test | 2 |
Test of Standard Written… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Shaibah, Hassan Sami; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2013
Traditionally, an anatomy practical examination is conducted using a free response format (FRF). However, this format is resource-intensive, as it requires a relatively large time investment from anatomy course faculty in preparation and grading. Thus, several interventions have been reported where the response format was changed to a selected…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Anatomy, Medical Education, Test Validity
Slepkov, Aaron D.; Shiell, Ralph C. – Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 2014
Constructed-response (CR) questions are a mainstay of introductory physics textbooks and exams. However, because of the time, cost, and scoring reliability constraints associated with this format, CR questions are being increasingly replaced by multiple-choice (MC) questions in formal exams. The integrated testlet (IT) is a recently developed…
Descriptors: Science Tests, Physics, Responses, Multiple Choice Tests
Sparfeldt, Jorn R.; Kimmel, Rumena; Lowenkamp, Lena; Steingraber, Antje; Rost, Detlef H. – Educational Assessment, 2012
Multiple-choice (MC) reading comprehension test items comprise three components: text passage, questions about the text, and MC answers. The construct validity of this format has been repeatedly criticized. In three between-subjects experiments, fourth graders (N[subscript 1] = 230, N[subscript 2] = 340, N[subscript 3] = 194) worked on three…
Descriptors: Test Items, Reading Comprehension, Construct Validity, Grade 4

Green, Kathy – Journal of Experimental Education, 1979
Reliabilities and concurrent validities of teacher-made multiple-choice and true-false tests were compared. No significant differences were found even when multiple-choice reliability was adjusted to equate testing time. (Author/MH)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Format
Laird, Barbara B. – Inquiry, 2003
Laird studies the relationship between two computerized nursing tests and finds a relationship between the two sets of scores. (Contains 2 tables.)
Descriptors: Nursing Education, Nurses, Computer Assisted Testing, Comparative Testing

Anderson, Paul S.; Hyers, Albert D. – 1991
Three descriptive statistics (difficulty, discrimination, and reliability) of multiple-choice (MC) test items were compared to those of a new (1980s) format of machine-scored questions. The new method, answer-bank multi-digit testing (MDT), uses alphabetized lists of up to 1,000 alternatives and approximates the completion style of assessment…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Correlation
Green, Kathy – 1978
Forty three-option multiple choice (MC) statements on a midterm examination were converted to 120 true-false (TF) statements, identical in content. Test forms (MC and TF) were randomly administered to 50 undergraduates, to investigate the validity and internal consistency reliability of the two forms. A Kuder-Richardson formula 20 reliability was…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests
Dowd, Steven B. – 1992
An alternative to multiple-choice (MC) testing is suggested as it pertains to the field of radiologic technology education. General principles for writing MC questions are given and contrasted with a new type of MC question, the alternate-choice (AC) question, in which the answer choices are embedded in the question in a short form that resembles…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education

Breland, Hunter M.; Gaynor, Judith L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1979
Over 2,000 writing samples were collected from four undergraduate institutions and compared, where possible, with scores on a multiple-choice test. High correlations between ratings of the writing samples and multiple-choice test scores were obtained. Samples contributed substantially to the prediction of both college grades and writing…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Correlation, Essay Tests
Melancon, Janet G.; Thompson, Bruce – 1989
Classical measurement theory was used to investigate the measurement (psychometric) characteristics of both parts of the Finding Embedded Figures Test (FEFT) administered in either a "no guessing" supply format or a multiple-choice selection format to undergraduate college students or to middle school students. Three issues were…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Construct Validity, Higher Education, Junior High School Students

Kent, Thomas H.; Albanese, Mark A. – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1987
Two types of computer-administered unit quizzes in a systematic pathology course for second-year medical students were compared. Quizzes composed of questions selected on the basis of a student's ability had higher correlations with the final examination than did quizzes composed of questions randomly selected from topic areas. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level
Yachimowicz, David J.; And Others – 1990
The psychometric properties of a paper-and-pencil instrument for assessing individual differences in cerebral dominance are explored. The instrument, Your Style of Learning and Thinking (SOLAT), contains 50 multiple-choice questions. The study subjects consisted of three groups: 235 undergraduate and graduate students, 124 undergraduate and…
Descriptors: Adults, Brain Hemisphere Functions, College Students, Comparative Testing

Trevisan, Michael S.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1991
The reliability and validity of multiple-choice tests were computed as a function of the number of options per item and student ability for 435 parochial high school juniors, who were administered the Washington Pre-College Test Battery. Results suggest the efficacy of the three-option item. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Testing, Distractors (Tests), Grade Point Average

Skakun, Ernest N.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
Factor analysis was used to determine whether computerized patient management problems had the same factor structure as multiple choice examinations and rating scales. It was determined that the factor structure was similar to the examinations but not the rating scale. (JKS)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Programs, Factor Structure
Melancon, Janet G.; Thompson, Bruce – 1990
Classical measurement theory was used to investigate measurement characteristics of both parts of the Finding Embedded Figures Test (FEFT) when the test was: administered in either a "no guessing" supply format or a multiple-choice selection format; administered to either undergraduate college students or middle school students; and…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Construct Validity, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2