NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shun-Fu Hu; Amery D. Wu; Jake Stone – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2025
Scoring high-dimensional assessments (e.g., > 15 traits) can be a challenging task. This paper introduces the multilabel neural network (MNN) as a scoring method for high-dimensional assessments. Additionally, it demonstrates how MNN can score the same test responses to maximize different performance metrics, such as accuracy, recall, or…
Descriptors: Tests, Testing, Scores, Test Construction
Andres De Los Reyes; Mo Wang; Matthew D. Lerner; Bridget A. Makol; Olivia M. Fitzpatrick; John R. Weisz – Grantee Submission, 2022
Researchers strategically assess youth mental health by soliciting reports from multiple informants. Typically, these informants (e.g., parents, teachers, youth themselves) vary in the social contexts where they observe youth. Decades of research reveal that the most common data conditions produced with this approach consist of discrepancies…
Descriptors: Mental Health, Measurement Techniques, Evaluation Methods, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seo, Hyojeong; Shogren, Karrie A.; Little, Todd D.; Thompson, James R.; Wehmeyer, Michael L. – American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2016
This study examined the convergent validity of the "Supports Intensity Scale-Adult Version" (SIS-A; Thompson et al., 2015a) and "Supports Intensity Scale-Children's Version" (SIS-C; Thompson et al., 2016a). Data from SISOnline (n = 129,864) for the SIS-A and from the SIS-C standardization sample (n = 4,015) were used for…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Test Validity, Adults, Children
Seo, Hyojeong; Shogren, Karrie A.; Little, Todd D.; Thompson, James R.; Wehmeyer, Michael L. – Grantee Submission, 2016
This study examined the convergent validity of the "Supports Intensity Scale-Adult Version" (SIS-A; Thompson et al., 2015a) and "Supports Intensity Scale-Children's Version" (SIS-C; Thompson et al., 2016a). Data from SISOnline (n = 129,864) for the SIS-A and from the SIS-C standardization sample (n = 4,015) were used for…
Descriptors: Adults, Children, Disabilities, Multitrait Multimethod Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bernard, Larry C.; Mills, Michael; Swenson, Leland; Walsh, R. Patricia – Assessment, 2008
We report the development of the Assessment of Individual Motives-Questionnaire (AIM-Q), a new instrument based on an evolutionary psychology theory of human motivation. It provides multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) assessment of individual differences on 15 motive scales. A total heterogeneous sample of N = 1,251 participated in eight studies that…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Questionnaires, Test Reliability, Multitrait Multimethod Techniques
Van Velsor, Ellen; Leslie, Jean Brittain; Fleenor, John W. – 1997
This book presents a nontechnical, step-by-step process that shows how to evaluate any 360-degree-feedback instrument intended for management or leadership development. The 360-degree-feedback instruments collect information from different sources about a target manager's performance, and they offer multiple perspectives. The 16 steps in…
Descriptors: Administrator Characteristics, Evaluation Methods, Feedback, Interrater Reliability
Chang, Lei – 1993
Equivalence in reliability and validity across 4-point and 6-point scales was assessed by fitting different measurement models through confirmatory factor analysis of a multitrait-multimethod covariance matrix. Responses to nine Likert-type items designed to measure perceived quantitative ability, self-perceived usefulness of quantitative…
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Testing, Education Majors, Graduate Students