NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)2
Audience
Practitioners1
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bieber, Gregg; Hulac, David M.; Schweinle, William – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2015
The present study investigated some psychometric properties of the Basic Reading Inventory (BRI), a widely used informal reading inventory. The BRI and Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) probes were administered to 149 third, fourth, and fifth graders. Test--retest and alternate forms reliability analyses indicated adequate…
Descriptors: Informal Reading Inventories, Psychometrics, Grade 3, Grade 4
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McKenna, Michael C.; Walpole, Sharon; Jang, Bong Gee – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2017
This study investigated the reliability and validity of Part 1 of the Informal Decoding Inventory (IDI), a free diagnostic assessment used to plan Tier 2 intervention for first graders with decoding deficits. Part 1 addresses single-syllable words and consists of five subtests that progress in difficulty and that contain real word and pseudoword…
Descriptors: Informal Reading Inventories, Decoding (Reading), Test Validity, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hollingsworth, Paul M.; Reutzel, D. Ray – Journal of Reading, 1988
Reviews the Sucher-Allred Group Reading Placement, used to determine the instructional reading level for students in grades 2-12. Concludes that the test correlates well with other standard tests and is useful as an informal reading inventory. (RS)
Descriptors: Informal Reading Inventories, Reading Comprehension, Test Reliability, Test Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Homan, Susan P.; Klesius, Janell P. – Reading Horizons, 1985
Confirms previous findings that the word recognition criterion for instructional reading level should be set at about 95 percent for students reading at grade levels one through six. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Informal Reading Inventories, Reading Research, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schell, Leo M.; Hanna, Gerald S. – Reading Teacher, 1981
Argues that informal reading inventories fail on several points to provide accurate and reliable scores on the subskills of reading. Asserts that the inventories cannot properly be used to assess children's specific strengths and weaknesses. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Informal Reading Inventories, Reading Comprehension, Reading Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Klesius, Janell P.; Homan, Susan P. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1985
The article reviews validity and reliability studies on the informal reading inventory, a diagnostic instrument to identify reading grade-level placement and strengths and weaknesses in work recognition and comprehension. Gives suggestions to improve the validity and reliability of existing inventories and to evaluate them in newly published…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Informal Reading Inventories, Learning Disabilities, Reading Difficulties
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lipa, Sally – Reading Teacher, 1985
Finds a number of problems with the test and concludes that there is little real advantage to using it in preference to other published informal reading inventories now available. (FL)
Descriptors: Informal Reading Inventories, Reading Diagnosis, Reading Instruction, Reading Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lipson, Marjorie Youmans; And Others – Reading Psychology, 1984
Uses case study data from three young readers to examine the assumption that commercial informal reading inventories are as reliable as teacher made tests. Questions that assumption. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Informal Reading Inventories, Reading Diagnosis, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harris, Larry A.; Niles, Jerome A. – Reading Horizons, 1982
Examines 12 commercially prepared informal reading inventories and discusses the advantages and disadvantages, as well as the unique features of each. (FL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Informal Reading Inventories
Schell, Leo M. – 1981
Errors in oral reading tests result from inaccuracies that tend to creep in because children are not totally consistent while taking a test and from inaccuracies caused when the examiner does not catch a word recognition error, giving credit for an answer that is more wrong than right or vice versa. Every test contains a standard error of…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Informal Reading Inventories, Oral Reading, Reading Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fuchs, Lynn S.; And Others – Reading Research Quarterly, 1982
Reports the results of a study that examined the technical adequacy of three selected informal reading inventory procedures. (AEA)
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Elementary Education, Informal Reading Inventories, Reading Materials
West, Ellen M. – 1977
This study tested the validity and reliability of the West Informal Reading Evaluation (WIRE), an unobtrusive screening device that identifies adult learners' reading abilities. Of the 154 students in basic education or high school completion courses who completed one form of WIRE, 123 subjects were administered another reading test that served as…
Descriptors: Adult Basic Education, Adults, Evaluation Methods, Informal Reading Inventories
Fuchs, Lynn; And Others – 1981
A study was conducted to explore the reliability and validity of three prominent procedures used in informal reading inventories (IRIs): (1) choosing a 95% word recognition accuracy standard for determining student instructional level, (2) arbitrarily selecting a passage to represent the difficulty level of a basal reader, and (3) employing…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Informal Reading Inventories, Reading Comprehension, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bristow, Page Simpson; And Others – Reading Teacher, 1983
Reports that reading instructional level scores of a teacher constructed informal reading inventory, the commercially prepared Basic Reading Inventory, the Metropolitan Achievement Test, and students' actual level of placement in books are roughly comparable but that the Wide Range Achievement Test reading subtest places children much higher. (FL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Informal Reading Inventories, Readability
Nolen, Patricia A.; Lam, Tony C. M. – 1981
A comparison was made of Durrell Analysis of Reading Difficulty and informal reading inventory (IRI) independent and instructional level designations for 15 children, aged 9 to 11 years, who had been referred to a diagnostic clinic for reading assessment. The children's reading performance was first scored according to procedures outlined in the…
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Informal Reading Inventories
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2