Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCummings, Jack A.; Nelson, R. Brett – Journal of Educational Research, 1980
Because teachers' oral directions for group achievement tests assume that children understand numerous basic concepts, the construct validity of subtests assessing abilities other than language is questionable. Implications for teacher administration of primary level tests and suggestions for future test construction are described. (JD)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Group Testing, Language Skills, Listening Comprehension
Peer reviewedThompson, Bruce; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1983
The present study assessed the feasibility of using a widely recognized style measure, the Group Embedded Figures Test, with fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-graders. The results were generally favorable with respect ot the test's applicability to these age groups. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Counseling Techniques, Field Dependence Independence, Group Testing, Guidance Centers
Alliger, R. J.; Harvey, A. L. – 1984
This article discusses practical and theoretical problems related to the measurement of formal operations. The first section of the article discusses problems in measuring formal operations using the clinical interview method. These problems include the lack of both a standardized interview and a uniform scoring procedure. Section two discusses…
Descriptors: Developmental Stages, Group Testing, Interviews, Objective Tests
Peer reviewedSwanson, Beverly B.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
Samples of entering first-grade students were used to examine the predictive validity of the group administered Metropolitan Readiness Test (MRT) and the individually administered Meeting Street School Screening Test (MSSST). The advantage of the latter was found to possibly outweigh the advantage of efficiency in group administration. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Grade 1, Group Testing, Individual Testing, Predictive Validity
Keating, Daniel P. – Early Education and Development, 2007
This article is a commentary for the special issue on the Early Development Instrument (EDI), a community tool to assess children's school readiness and developmental outcomes at a group level. The EDI is administered by kindergarten teachers, who assess their kindergarten students on 5 developmental domains: physical health and well-being, social…
Descriptors: School Readiness, Formative Evaluation, Kindergarten, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewedPratt, C.; Hacker, R. G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1984
A unidimensional latent trait model was used to test a single-factor hypothesis of the Lawson Classroom Test of Formal Reasoning. The test failed to provide a valid measure of formal reasoning. This was a result of test format which neglected aspects of formal reasoning emphasized by Inhelder and Piaget. (Author/DWH)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Group Testing, Higher Education, Latent Trait Theory
Wheatley, Grayson H. – 1972
The objective of the study was to develop a test of concept formation which would: (1) not be biased by reading difficulty; (2) be sufficiently stimulating to capture the attention of the students; (3) incorporate both aspects of concept formation of discriminative response and conservation; (4) have a spread of item difficulty appropriate for…
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Conservation (Concept), Elementary School Students, Films
Peer reviewedWitkin, Belle Ruth; And Others – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1977
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Group Testing, Language Acquisition, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedFabry, Julian J. – Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1976
A test of Holland's vocational theory across and within selected occupational groups demonstrated concurrent validity for three of the four groups investigated. Statistically significant coefficients of concordance indicated a degree of agreement among individuals in each of the occupational groups investigated. (Author)
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Group Behavior, Group Testing, Interest Inventories
Weiss, David J.; Betz, Nancy E. – 1973
Research to date on adaptive (sequential, branched, individualized, tailored, programmed, response-contingent) ability testing is reviewed and summarized, following a brief review of problems inherent in conventional individual and group approaches to ability measurement. Research reviewed includes empirical, simulation and theoretical studies of…
Descriptors: Ability, Comparative Analysis, Group Testing, Individual Testing
Peer reviewedSchudson, Michael S. – Harvard Educational Review, 1972
This essay traces the history of the College Board seeking explanations for what it has become and as well, clues to what it and American education generally might have been. In essence, the original goal of the college boards, a true merit system, has been lost. (Author/AF)
Descriptors: College Admission, College Entrance Examinations, Group Testing, History
Peer reviewedBook, Robert M. – Psychology in the Schools, 1980
Significant correlations were found between risk group designation and achievement performance. Findings support the predictive validity of screening procedures for group test performance through grade four. Sutdents perform consistently at the same level year to year in a regular class instructional program. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Education, Followup Studies
Peer reviewedGolden, Charles J. – Journal of Personality Assessment, 1975
An attempt was made to develop a form of the Stroop Test which could be used in both group and individual settings and serve as a basic form for interested researchers. Group and individual measures differ only in that the group test does not require a spoken response. (Author/BJG)
Descriptors: Group Testing, Higher Education, Individual Testing, Personality Measures
Peer reviewedReynolds, Cecil R. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1978
Primary school children were administered the Draw-A-Design and Draw-A Child subtests of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities in a group setting. Results suggest that the McCarthy drawing tests may be administered validly in a group format, and that these scores are significantly related to school achievement. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Correlation, Freehand Drawing
Peer reviewedKline, P; Cooper, C. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
Test scores from Comprehensive Ability Battery (CAB) administered to 103 British students were subjected to oblique factor analysis. Six factors were extracted which fitted closely those described by Cattell and colleagues, thus supporting their claims concerning structure of abilities and utility of this American instrument in Great Britain. (CMG)
Descriptors: Cross Cultural Studies, Culture Fair Tests, Factor Analysis, Foreign Countries

Direct link
