Descriptor
| Objective Tests | 2 |
| Testing | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Admission Criteria | 1 |
| Answer Sheets | 1 |
| Aptitude Tests | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| College Admission | 1 |
| College Applicants | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research in Higher Education | 1 |
Author
| Aiken, Lewis R. | 1 |
| Zorn, Jeffrey L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 2 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Researchers | 2 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
| Test of Standard Written… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAiken, Lewis R. – Research in Higher Education, 1991
Research and practice in detecting and controlling for cheating on objective tests are reviewed and a small survey of attitudes and practices is reported. Potential of two computer programs to detect error similarities and use of multiple answer-sheet forms to control cheating are discussed. Teacher cheating is also addressed. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Answer Sheets, Cheating, Computer Software, Error Patterns
Zorn, Jeffrey L. – 1983
Although by traditional measures of test validity, the verbal section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) is not culture biased, it, along with the English Composition Test and the Test of Standard Written English, reinforces a narrow view of academic excellence that excludes culturally different youths. Designed to prevent admission errors, the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Admission Criteria, Aptitude Tests
