NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Linn, Robert L. – Educational Researcher, 2009
Atkinson and Geiser (2009) make a strong argument for moving to a new form of college admissions testing using curriculum-based achievement tests. In making their case, however, they exaggerate the weaknesses of current tests such as the ACT and SAT by minimizing these tests' predictive utility and claiming a stronger relationship to socioeconomic…
Descriptors: National Curriculum, Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Achievement Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slinde, Jefferey A.; Linn, Robert L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1978
Use of the Rasch model for vertical equating of tests is discussed. Although use of the model is promising, empirical results raise questions about the adequacy of the Rasch model. Latent trait models with more parameters may be necessary. (JKS)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Difficulty Level, Equated Scores, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Linn, Robert L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1983
Four considerations that enhance the instructional importance of tests are content match, use of feedback, a flagging function, and the increasing tendency to attach sanctions and rewards to standardized test results. These sanctions are apt to force greater attention to the other three characteristics, strengthening the links between instruction…
Descriptors: Instruction, Instructional Improvement, Measurement Objectives, Minimum Competency Testing
Kiplinger, Vonda L.; Linn, Robert L. – 1993
It has been argued that the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) underestimates student achievement because the assessment has no consequences for the students, their teachers, or for their schools. This study was conducted to determine whether differences in test administration conditions and presumed levels of motivation engendered…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Estimation (Mathematics)
Linn, Robert L.; and others – Educ Psychol Meas, 1969
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Programing, Test Construction, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Linn, Robert L. – Review of Educational Research, 1973
There is more than one reasonable definition of test fairness and these definitions are in conflict; alternate formulations are discussed here. (JB)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Literature Reviews, Measurement Techniques, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Linn, Robert L.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
Existing item response data on three achievement tests were used to compare the use of two sequential testing procedures with conventional testing for purposes of dichotomous decisions on each of the three dimensions. (Author/AG)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Individual Characteristics, Individualized Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Linn, Robert L. – American Psychologist, 1986
Many of the recent appeals for educational improvement place great reliance on standardized tests as instruments of reform. The appropriateness and interpretation of these tests remain unresolved issues. Concepts of cognitive psychology should be integrated into the development of intelligence and achievement tests. (Author/VM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Cognitive Psychology, Educational Assessment, Educational Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Linn, Robert L.; Slinde, Jeffrey A. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
This study investigated the adequacy of the Rasch model in equating existing standardized tests with groups of examinees not widely separated in ability. With the exception of one test pair and one grade level, the Rasch model using the anchor test procedure provided a reasonably satisfactory means of equating. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Goodness of Fit, Intermediate Grades, Item Analysis