Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Answer Sheets | 3 |
Testing | 3 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
Achievement Rating | 1 |
Answer Keys | 1 |
Cheating | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Educational Practices | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Aiken, Lewis R. | 1 |
Cirillo, Pier F. | 1 |
Daniel M. Settlage | 1 |
Jim R. Wollscheid | 1 |
Merrel, Jeremy D. | 1 |
Schwartz, Pauline M. | 1 |
Webb, Jeffrey A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Daniel M. Settlage; Jim R. Wollscheid – Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2024
The examination of the testing mode effect has received increased attention as higher education has shifted to remote testing during the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe the testing mode effect consists of four components: the ability to physically write on the test, the method of answer recording, the proctoring/testing environment, and the effect…
Descriptors: College Students, Macroeconomics, Tests, Answer Sheets
Merrel, Jeremy D.; Cirillo, Pier F.; Schwartz, Pauline M.; Webb, Jeffrey A. – Higher Education Studies, 2015
Multiple choice testing is a common but often ineffective method for evaluating learning. A newer approach, however, using Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF AT®, Epstein Educational Enterprise, Inc.) forms, offers several advantages. In particular, a student learns immediately if his or her answer is correct and, in the case of an…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Feedback (Response), Evaluation Methods, Guessing (Tests)

Aiken, Lewis R. – Research in Higher Education, 1991
Research and practice in detecting and controlling for cheating on objective tests are reviewed and a small survey of attitudes and practices is reported. Potential of two computer programs to detect error similarities and use of multiple answer-sheet forms to control cheating are discussed. Teacher cheating is also addressed. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Answer Sheets, Cheating, Computer Software, Error Patterns