Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Cognitive Ability | 4 |
Test Use | 4 |
Testing | 4 |
Intelligence Tests | 3 |
Cognitive Measurement | 2 |
Predictive Validity | 2 |
Racial Differences | 2 |
Test Bias | 2 |
Testing Problems | 2 |
Anglo Americans | 1 |
Attitudes | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Benson, Nicholas | 1 |
Carlson, Jerry S. | 1 |
Charles, Jennifer E. | 1 |
Floyd, Randy G. | 1 |
Kranzler, John H. | 1 |
Reeve, Charlie L. | 1 |
Schmitz, Florian | 1 |
Wilhelm, Oliver | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
California (San Bernardino) | 1 |
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schmitz, Florian; Wilhelm, Oliver – Journal of Intelligence, 2019
Current taxonomies of intelligence comprise two factors of mental speed, clerical speed (Gs), and elementary cognitive speed (Gt). Both originated from different research traditions and are conceptualized as dissociable constructs in current taxonomies. However, previous research suggests that tasks of one category can be transferred into the…
Descriptors: Taxonomy, Intelligence Tests, Testing, Test Format
Kranzler, John H.; Benson, Nicholas; Floyd, Randy G. – International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 2016
This article briefly reviews the history of intellectual assessment of children and youth in the United States of America, as well as current practices and future directions. Although administration of intelligence tests in the schools has been a longstanding practice in the United States, their use has also elicited sharp controversy over time.…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Children, Youth, Test Construction
Reeve, Charlie L.; Charles, Jennifer E. – Intelligence, 2008
The current study examines the views of experts in the science of mental abilities about the primacy and uniqueness of "g" and the social implications of ability testing, and compares their responses to the views of a group of non-expert psychologists. Results indicate expert consensus that "g" is an important, non-trivial determinant (or at least…
Descriptors: Race, Psychologists, Testing, Predictive Validity
Carlson, Jerry S. – 1983
This study assessed the usefulness of the dynamic testing approach to optimize testing procedures by reducing or eliminating bias, conceived of as error in measurement attributable to factors entering into performance which were not the target of the assessment. The study examined: (1) whether the dynamic assessment approach yields information…
Descriptors: Anglo Americans, Blacks, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Measurement