NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards2
Showing 76 to 90 of 12,648 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yicong Zheng; Aike Shi; Xiaonan L. Liu – npj Science of Learning, 2024
This Perspective article expands on a working memory-dependent dual-process model, originally proposed by Zheng et al., to elucidate individual differences in the testing effect. This model posits that the testing effect comprises two processes: retrieval-attempt and post-retrieval re-encoding. We substantiate this model with empirical evidence…
Descriptors: Short Term Memory, Models, Individual Differences, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Corcoran, Stephanie – Contemporary School Psychology, 2022
With the iPad-mediated cognitive assessment gaining popularity with school districts and the need for alternative modes for training and instruction during this COVID-19 pandemic, school psychology training programs will need to adapt to effectively train their students to be competent in administering, scoring, an interpreting cognitive…
Descriptors: School Psychologists, Professional Education, Job Skills, Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Olsho, Alexis; Smith, Trevor I.; Eaton, Philip; Zimmerman, Charlotte; Boudreaux, Andrew; White Brahmia, Suzanne – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2023
We developed the Physics Inventory of Quantitative Literacy (PIQL) to assess students' quantitative reasoning in introductory physics contexts. The PIQL includes several "multiple-choice-multipleresponse" (MCMR) items (i.e., multiple-choice questions for which more than one response may be selected) as well as traditional single-response…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Science Tests, Physics, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Kim, Sooyeon; Walker, Michael – ETS Research Report Series, 2021
In this investigation, we used real data to assess potential differential effects associated with taking a test in a test center (TC) versus testing at home using remote proctoring (RP). We used a pseudo-equivalent groups (PEG) approach to examine group equivalence at the item level and the total score level. If our assumption holds that the PEG…
Descriptors: Testing, Distance Education, Comparative Analysis, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Julia Glaser; Tobias Richter – Teaching of Psychology, 2025
Background: Practice tests have been shown to be an effective means to foster long-term retention in higher education, at least compared to restudying (i.e., the testing effect). Objective: The present study replicated and extended prior research by examining whether and to what extent the positive effects of testing on long-term retention in a…
Descriptors: Testing, Retention (Psychology), Study Habits, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mara E. McFadden; Sara J. Finney – International Journal of Testing, 2025
Priming examinees with questions about intended effort prior to testing has been shown to significantly increase examinee expended effort via self-reported effort and response-time effort. However, this question-behavior effect seems to wear off later in a testing session. We examined whether administering a second "dose" of the…
Descriptors: Priming, Test Content, Student Behavior, Student Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Camille Tordet; Jonathan Fernandez; Eric Jamet – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Previous research has demonstrated that quizzing can improve self-regulation processes and learning performances. However, it remains unclear whether quizzes in multimedia material bring similar benefits, and whether interindividual differences such as working memory capacity (WMC) modulate quizzing effects. Aims: This study aimed to…
Descriptors: Self Management, Academic Achievement, Cognitive Processes, Multimedia Materials
Lazarus, Sheryl S.; Quanbeck, Mari; Thurlow, Martha L. – National Center on Educational Outcomes, 2022
To help ensure that assessments are properly administered, states have developed policies about who can administer or proctor assessments, and the training they must have. This report presents the findings of our analysis of states' 2021 policies on the qualifications and requirements for test administrators, proctors, and accommodations providers…
Descriptors: Testing, Examiners, Supervision, Testing Accommodations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Derrik Motz; Scott Rathwell; Bettina Callary; Bradley William Young – Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2024
The Adult-Oriented Sport Coaching Survey (AOSCS) is a valid and reliable measure of coaches' and Masters athletes' perspectives of how often adult-oriented coaching practices are used. However, Masters athletes' heterogenous traits have been acknowledged as barriers to generalizing research findings on coaching behaviors. Therefore, this study…
Descriptors: Athletes, Adults, Athletic Coaches, Age
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ioana-Elena Oana; Carsten Q. Schneider – Sociological Methods & Research, 2024
The robustness of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) results features high on the agenda of methodologists and practitioners. This article aims at advancing this debate on several fronts. First, in line with the extant literature, we take a comprehensive view on robustness arguing that decisions on calibration, consistency, and frequency…
Descriptors: Robustness (Statistics), Qualitative Research, Comparative Analysis, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Richard G. Kunkel – Journal of Legal Studies Education, 2024
For many professors, testing is primarily a tool for assessing the learning of students. However, research into the "testing effect" has established the value of testing also as a learning tool, not just as an assessment tool. This article provides an overview of this research and also of my own experiences in using a variety of testing…
Descriptors: Testing, Test Construction, College Students, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wesley A. Sims; Rondy Yu; Danielle Zahn – Contemporary School Psychology, 2024
While disruptions to typical education, special education, and psycho-educational service delivery practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have dissipated, their impact magnified educational systems' overreliance on evaluations to determine eligibility for special education and related services. Given that the potential for future…
Descriptors: Special Education, COVID-19, Pandemics, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Aaron S. Richmond; Anna Ropp; Jennifer Bradford; Graham S. Ignizio; Jeff Hammond; Denise Mowder; Jessica M. Bittmann – College Teaching, 2024
Past research indicates that the testing effect is an effective tool to improve memory and retention and academic performance, however, very few studies have investigated the effects across academic disciplines with a focus on higher- vs. lower-level learning. Therefore, in the current study, we sought to examine whether the testing effect occurs…
Descriptors: Testing, Cognitive Processes, Learning Processes, Intellectual Disciplines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Austin M. Shin; Ayaan M. Kazerouni – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2024
Background and Context: Students' programming projects are often assessed on the basis of their tests as well as their implementations, most commonly using test adequacy criteria like branch coverage, or, in some cases, mutation analysis. As a result, students are implicitly encouraged to use these tools during their development process (i.e., so…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Programming, Student Projects, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2024
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is an integral measure of academic progress across the nation and over time. It is the largest nationally representative and continuing assessment of what our nation's students know and can do in various subjects, such as civics, mathematics, reading, and U.S. history. The program also…
Descriptors: National Competency Tests, Preadolescents, Adolescents, Mathematics Achievement
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  844