Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
| Adkins, Deborah | 1 |
| Archer, Mary | 1 |
| Cronin, John | 1 |
| Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
| Kingsbury, G. Gage | 1 |
| Knowlton, Marie | 1 |
| Martin, Jean | 1 |
| Seeling, Sharon | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Minnesota | 2 |
| Arizona | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| Colorado | 1 |
| Delaware | 1 |
| Idaho | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| Indiana | 1 |
| Kansas | 1 |
| Maine | 1 |
| Maryland | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKnowlton, Marie; Seeling, Sharon; Martin, Jean; Archer, Mary – RE:view, 2003
This article discusses the structure of a committee that evaluates assessments for students with visual impairments and the process by which the committee arrives at its recommendations to test developers and administrators. Concerns and preferred practices that have been revealed by the committee's two years of experience are discussed. (CR)
Descriptors: Blindness, Educational Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Download full textCronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Adkins, Deborah; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007
At the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is the call for all students to be "proficient" in reading and mathematics by 2014. Yet the law expects each state to define proficiency as it sees fit and design its own tests. This study investigated three research questions related to this policy: (1) How consistent are various…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Mathematics Tests, Test Validity, Reading Tests
