NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Myford, Carol M.; Wolfe, Edward W. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2009
In this study, we describe a framework for monitoring rater performance over time. We present several statistical indices to identify raters whose standards drift and explain how to use those indices operationally. To illustrate the use of the framework, we analyzed rating data from the 2002 Advanced Placement English Literature and Composition…
Descriptors: English Literature, Advanced Placement, Measures (Individuals), Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clauser, Brian E.; Mee, Janet; Baldwin, Su G.; Margolis, Melissa J.; Dillon, Gerard F. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2009
Although the Angoff procedure is among the most widely used standard setting procedures for tests comprising multiple-choice items, research has shown that subject matter experts have considerable difficulty accurately making the required judgments in the absence of examinee performance data. Some authors have viewed the need to provide…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Program Effectiveness, Expertise, Health Personnel
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cui, Ying; Leighton, Jacqueline P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2009
In this article, we introduce a person-fit statistic called the hierarchy consistency index (HCI) to help detect misfitting item response vectors for tests developed and analyzed based on a cognitive model. The HCI ranges from -1.0 to 1.0, with values close to -1.0 indicating that students respond unexpectedly or differently from the responses…
Descriptors: Test Length, Simulation, Correlation, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trentham, Landa L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Educational Testing, Elementary Education, Grade 6
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rowley, Glenn L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Anxiety, Educational Testing, Guessing (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Phillips, Beeman N. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Children, Educational Testing, Performance Factors, Response Style (Tests)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fine, Doris Landau – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1979
Three questions are discussed concerning this test: for what population is it appropriate; what is its purpose; and what are the qualifications required for proper administration and interpretation? It is concluded that it is a useful test, but caution is appropriate in answering the three questions. (CTM)
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Mental Retardation, Motor Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koffler, Stephen L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1980
Cut-off scores from two approaches for setting standards are examined. Standards determined from judgments about groups and from inspection of test content are compared. Results indicate that there was neither consistency nor pattern to cut-off scores set from the two procedures. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Cutting Scores, Educational Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stiggins, Richard J.; Bridgeford, Nancy J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1985
The nature and quality of teacher-developed tests was studied in a national sample of 228 teachers representing four grade levels and several subjects. Teachers described their patterns of test use, concerns about assessment, and use of performance testing. Teacher-developed performance assessment was heavily used. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Testing, Elementary Secondary Education