Descriptor
Ability Identification | 4 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 4 |
Individual Testing | 4 |
Testing Problems | 4 |
Black Students | 3 |
Court Litigation | 3 |
Government School Relationship | 3 |
Intelligence Tests | 3 |
Labeling (of Persons) | 3 |
Mild Mental Retardation | 3 |
Racial Composition | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
School Psychology Review | 3 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - General | 3 |
ERIC Digests in Full Text | 1 |
ERIC Publications | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
California | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Larry P v Riles | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Grist, Susan; And Others – 1989
Computerized adaptive tests (CATs) make it possible to estimate the ability of each student during the testing process. The computer presents items to students at the appropriate level, and students take different versions of the same test. Computerized testing increases the flexibility of test management in that: (1) tests are given on demand and…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Uses in Education

Bersoff, Donald N. – School Psychology Review, 1980
This article presents the background, the history, and the implications of the Larry P. v Riles decisions in 1972 and in 1979 in which a federal district court enjoined California from using any standardized intelligence tests to assess Black children for eligibility for classes of educable mentally retarded. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Ability Grouping, Ability Identification, Black Students, Court Litigation

Reschly, Daniel J. – School Psychology Review, 1980
The analysis in this article is directed to the basic issues: Are IQ tests biased against Black children? And are IQ tests valid for the placement of Black children in special programs? The research evidence on these major issues is ambiguous and contradictory. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Black Students, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education

MacMillan, Donald L.; Meyers, C. Edward – School Psychology Review, 1980
The Larry P. decision is criticized with reference to: (1) predictive tests and the standard curriculum; (2) the court's portrayal of special classes; (3) the effects of the 1972 decision on special class enrollment; (4) semantic confusion; and (5) the impact on Black children who experience academic difficulty. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Black Students, Compensatory Education, Court Litigation