Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Educational Indicators | 2 |
Educational Testing | 2 |
Student Evaluation | 2 |
Test Validity | 2 |
Testing Problems | 2 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Accreditation (Institutions) | 1 |
Achievement Rating | 1 |
Articulation (Education) | 1 |
Change Strategies | 1 |
College Outcomes Assessment | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Arizona | 1 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Kansas | 1 |
Maine | 1 |
Maryland | 1 |
Massachusetts | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wright, Robert E. – College Student Journal, 2010
The use of standardized tests for outcome assessment has grown dramatically in recent years. Two driving factors have been the No Child Left Behind legislation, and the increase in outcome assessment measures by accrediting agencies such as AACSB, the international accrediting body for business schools. Despite the growth in usage, little effort…
Descriptors: College Outcomes Assessment, Educational Testing, Standardized Tests, Accreditation (Institutions)
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Adkins, Deborah; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007
At the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is the call for all students to be "proficient" in reading and mathematics by 2014. Yet the law expects each state to define proficiency as it sees fit and design its own tests. This study investigated three research questions related to this policy: (1) How consistent are various…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Mathematics Tests, Test Validity, Reading Tests