NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang, Kai-Lin; Idris, Khairiani – Statistics Education Research Journal, 2021
This article develops an analytical framework for analysing college (tertiary) statistics textbooks in terms of text accessibility by integrating the text, the reader, and the content into the framework. Five accessibility attributes of science texts were adapted to conceptualize the accessibility of statistics texts. For each accessibility…
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Statistics Education, Textbooks, Readability
Rush, R. Timothy – 1984
Noting that readability formulas are strictly text-based and therefore do not reflect the interactive nature of the reading process, this paper argues that many of the instructional material evaluations for which such formulas are used are inappropriate and offers more reader-based alternatives to the use of formulas. The first half of the paper…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Materials, Readability
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Luiten, John; And Others – 1978
A method proposed by McCuaig and Hutchings to assess the internal readability variation of books using the Fry readability formula was empirically tested in an analysis of six elementary basal and ten secondary remedial readers. Each book was treated as a series of consecutive 100-word samples. Means and standard deviations were computed for both…
Descriptors: Basic Reading, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Predictive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bradley, John M.; Ames, Wilbur S. – Journal of Reading, 1984
Describes the Luiten, Ames, Bradley Readability Variation Method for estimating the variation within a text. Concludes that it is practical and relatively accurate. (HOD)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Readability
Indiana State Dept. of Public Instruction, Indianapolis. Div. of Reading Effectiveness. – 1977
The purpose of this booklet is to assist local schools in making thorough assessments of instructional materials for textbook adoption. The booklet contains a checklist for evaluating instructional materials, a checklist summary sheet, and an appendix explaining readability analyses. The checklist is divided into eight sections: physical features…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hollabaugh, Mark – Journal of College Science Teaching, 1989
Provides step-by-step procedures for developing an index which uses the Gunning Fog technique to evaluate the level of reading difficulty of textbooks. Cites examples, illustrations, and several warnings in the discussion. (RT)
Descriptors: College Science, Content Analysis, Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods
Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2010
One of the key requirements of the Common Core State Standards for Reading is that all students must be able to comprehend texts of steadily increasing complexity as they progress through school. By the time they complete the core, students must be able to read and comprehend independently and proficiently the kinds of complex texts commonly found…
Descriptors: Reading Ability, Reading Instruction, Reading Comprehension, Glossaries
Goeke, Dieter; Kornelius, Joachim – Linguistik und Didaktik, 1978
Finds that teaching textbooks are becoming more complex and difficult, and less interesting. A procedure is suggested for measuring these qualities in a textbook, based on the "Reading Ease" and "Human Interest" indices of R. Flesh, in Volume 6 of his work "The Good Companion". Two samples from texts are appended. (IFS/WGA)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Language Instruction, Readability, Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Quereshi, M. Y.; Sackett, Paul R. – Teaching of Psychology, 1977
Description of the method and results of a study that evaluated introductory psychology textbooks according to their human interest and readability. It updates a previous study. (ND)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Teaching of Psychology, 1977
Anonymous criticism of a reading consultant's readability analysis of the authors' introductory psychology textbook. (ND)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Measurement Instruments, Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Longo, Judith A. – Journal of Reading, 1982
Validates the college-level designation of the Fry Graph using comparative validity data. (AEA)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Materials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Croll, William; Moskaluk, Sheila – Teaching of Psychology, 1977
Comparison of evaluation method and results of ten introductory psychology textbooks. They were evaluated according to both Flesch formulas and student opinions on both readability and interest levels. (ND)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Psychology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grouws, Douglas A.; Robinson, Richard D. – School Science and Mathematics, 1973
Describes the "cloze" procedure for judging the readability of textbook prose and in particular how this procedure may be applied to written mathematical materials. (JP)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Evaluation Methods, Mathematics Education, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Doran, Rodney L.; Sheard, Doris M. – School Science and Mathematics, 1974
Discusses categories for science textbook analysis under the headings of: Readability, Content, Presentation of Material, Mathematical Demands, Appearance, Quality of Illustrations, and Teacher Aids. An analysis form is appended as a guide for science teachers and administrators in their evaluation and selection of appropriate science textbooks.…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Readability, Reading Materials
Anderson, Jonathan; Coates, Jim – Australian Journal of Reading, 1979
Answers questions most frequently asked about the cloze procedure; suggests using cloze exercises to gauge the suitability of reading materials, showing how the technique taps meaning derived from text and indexes both textual reading difficulty and students' comprehension ability. (AEA)
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Readability
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2