NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Location
Hong Kong1
India1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 27 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Giordano, Gerard – Clearing House, 1982
Offers a worksheet for evaluating the readability of content area textbooks. (RL)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Evaluation Criteria, Readability, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fielding, Elizabeth Nolan – Reading, 1990
Discusses appropriate reading material selection in light of content area reading instruction. Presents some ideas for determining the difficulty level of textbooks and other materials. Concludes that teaching reading in the content areas is one way to focus on the process of reading as an instrument to develop cognitive skills and thought…
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Middle Schools, Readability Formulas, Reading Material Selection
Lovitt, Thomas C.; And Others – B. C. Journal of Special Education, 1987
An alternative to readability formulas and achievement tests to let high school students read orally and then recount what they read. Vocabulary scores and oral reading rates were demonstrated as the best predictors of test performance with a minimum oral reading rate of 135 words per minute necessary to profit from textbooks. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, High Schools, Oral Reading, Reading Difficulties
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
VanderMeulen, Kenneth; Harris, Mary L. – Reading Horizons, 1974
Presents an annotated list of textbooks in a number of vocational content areas and includes the readability level of each text. (TO)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Content Area Reading, Readability, Reading Material Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Speigel, Dixie Lee; Wright, Jill D. – Journal of Reading, 1983
Discusses a study designed to explore teachers' attitudes toward text selection, focusing on text characteristics and reasons for a particular selection. (AEA)
Descriptors: Biology, Content Area Reading, Readability Formulas, Reading Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krause, Kenneth G. – Journal of Reading, 1976
Provides a check list of evaluation criteria to supplement the SMOG readability formula in choosing new content area textbooks. (Author/KS)
Descriptors: Air Pollution, Check Lists, Content Area Reading, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Agnihotri, R. K.; Khanna, A. L. – Journal of Reading, 1992
Shows how a number of readability measures developed in English were applied to a textbook written in Hindi. Emphasizes that the more recent approaches to readability that focus on syntax, conceptual difficulty, and organization are a teacher's best help in selecting materials for students. (SR)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Foreign Countries, Hindi, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Emmerich, Paul – Reading Improvement, 1977
Gives faculty members without formal training in reading a tool to assist in textbook selection at universities in bilingual settings. (RL)
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Bilingual Schools, Bilingual Students, Check Lists
Roe, Betty Daniel – J Reading Spec, 1970
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Elementary School Curriculum, Literature Reviews, Publishing Industry
Ciborowski, Jean – 1992
Proposing two major shifts in how to involve low readers more effectively in textbook learning, this book suggests that students, even those with low reading skills, can learn to use mainstream textbooks, and that textbooks can be designed to make them more usable for all students. The book presents a series of instructional techniques that…
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Elementary Secondary Education, Low Achievement, Readability
Jackson, Evelyn – 1980
The survey step in the SQ3R study reading strategy consists of scanning the reading material and its organizational features to establish the nature/magnitude of the reading task and to formulate guidelines for accomplishing that task. When the chapters of six history textbooks were examined for the presence, absence, and number of organizational…
Descriptors: Advance Organizers, Content Area Reading, Higher Education, Reading Skills
Stoddard, Ann H. – 1984
Intended for primary school teachers involved in social studies instruction, this paper offers guidelines for selecting and using children's literature to teach social studies concepts. The paper first deals with selecting children's literature works, presenting basic considerations relating children's developmental stages to characteristics of…
Descriptors: Childrens Literature, Content Area Reading, Evaluation Criteria, Guidelines
Templer, Lois – 1982
Cloze tests assess the readability of a book for students in a far more personal way than formulas or standardized tests of reading comprehension. The cloze procedure reflects the total language abilities in the following ways: familiarity with sentence structure, context clues, and vocabulary, and the ability to draw inferences from written…
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Content Area Reading, Language Aptitude, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wright, Jill D.; Spiegel, Dixie Lee – American Biology Teacher, 1984
Discusses findings from a questionnaire survey of 622 biology teachers on: (1) how accurately they can judge readability of instructional materials; (2) what factors they consider when judging readability levels; and (3) if they considered differences in students' reading ability when selecting reading materials for them to use. (JN)
Descriptors: Biology, Content Area Reading, High Schools, Readability
Forsten, Char; Grant, Jim; Hollas, Betty – 2003
Differentiating textbooks is modifying or adapting textbooks in ways that make them easier for students to read and comprehend and then to retain what they have read. This book explains how teachers can motivate their students as they are confronted with text which is generally written in a "less-than-engaging" expository style. The strategies…
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Elementary Secondary Education, Grouping (Instructional Purposes), Individualized Reading
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2