Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Electronic Publishing | 2 |
Readability | 2 |
Readability Formulas | 2 |
Statistical Analysis | 2 |
Textbooks | 2 |
College Students | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Content Area Reading | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Critical Reading | 1 |
Difficulty Level | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ciampa, Katia | 1 |
Dastur, Farhad N. | 1 |
Fazio, Xavier | 1 |
Gallagher, Tiffany | 1 |
Jhangiani, Rajiv S. | 1 |
Le Grand, Richard | 1 |
Penner, Kurt | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Dale Chall Readability Formula | 1 |
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jhangiani, Rajiv S.; Dastur, Farhad N.; Le Grand, Richard; Penner, Kurt – Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2018
The increase in the cost of college textbooks together with the proliferation of digital content and devices has inspired the development of open textbooks, open educational resources that are free, openly licensed, and often peer-reviewed. Although several published studies have investigated the impact of open textbook adoption on educational…
Descriptors: Textbooks, Electronic Publishing, Student Attitudes, College Students
Gallagher, Tiffany; Fazio, Xavier; Ciampa, Katia – Canadian Journal of Education, 2017
Science curriculum standards were mapped onto various texts (literacy readers, trade books, online articles). Statistical analyses highlighted the inconsistencies among readability formulae for Grades 2-6 levels of the standards. There was a lack of correlation among the readability measures, and also when comparing different text sources. Online…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Readability, Textbooks, Science Education