Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Moral Development | 3 |
Theories | 3 |
Measures (Individuals) | 2 |
Moral Values | 2 |
Cognitive Development | 1 |
Competition | 1 |
Conflict Resolution | 1 |
Cooperation | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Developmental Stages | 1 |
Ethical Instruction | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Bebeau, Muriel J. | 1 |
Curzer, Howard J. | 1 |
DuPree, Devin G. | 1 |
Johnson, David W. | 1 |
Narvaez, Darcia | 1 |
Sattler, Sabrina | 1 |
Smith-Genthôs, K. Rachelle | 1 |
Thoma, Stephen J. | 1 |
Tjosvold, Dean | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Defining Issues Test | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Thoma, Stephen J.; Bebeau, Muriel J.; Narvaez, Darcia – Theory and Research in Education, 2016
In a 2014 paper in "Theory and Research in Education," Howard Curzer and colleagues critique the Defining Issues Test of moral judgment development according to eight criteria that are described as difficulties any measure of educational outcomes must address. This article highlights how Curzer et al. do not consult existing empirical…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Moral Development, Moral Values, Values
Curzer, Howard J.; Sattler, Sabrina; DuPree, Devin G.; Smith-Genthôs, K. Rachelle – Theory and Research in Education, 2014
The ethics assessment industry is currently dominated by the second version of the Defining Issues Test (DIT2). In this article, we describe an alternative assessment instrument called the Sphere-Specific Moral Reasoning and Theory Survey (SMARTS), which measures the respondent's level of moral development in several respects. We describe eight…
Descriptors: Ethics, Ethical Instruction, Moral Values, Moral Development

Tjosvold, Dean; Johnson, David W. – Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1978
Undergraduates discussed a moral issue with a confederate who had the same opinion (no controversy) or opposite opinion (controversy) within either a cooperative or a competitive context. Subjects in the controversy conditions indicated more conceptual conflict, engaged in more information seeking, and were more accurate in taking the cognitive…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Competition, Conflict Resolution, Cooperation