Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
Geismar, Thomas J. | 1 |
Hottenstein, David S. | 1 |
Isenhour, Kimberly Gaskey | 1 |
Kramer, Steven L. | 1 |
Pullease, Barbara G. | 1 |
Queen, J. Allen | 1 |
Shortt, Thomas L. | 1 |
Thayer, Yvonne V. | 1 |
Winn, Deanna D. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 7 |
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Canada | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Utah | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Education Partnerships, Inc., 2012
Why do a trimester schedule? With the advent of block scheduling, many high schools conducted research on utilizing that plan in a trimester format. There appeared to be three issues that most schools faced: (1) How to provide substantive instructional time that was not fragmented?; (2) How does the school climate contribute positively to…
Descriptors: Educational Strategies, Teaching Methods, Block Scheduling, Trimester System

Shortt, Thomas L.; Thayer, Yvonne V. – NASSP Bulletin, 1997
High school block scheduling is in its earliest stages. Although time structures have changed, usage has not. Block schedules are threatened when curriculum standards and student mobility are ignored, courses are improperly sequenced, funding for increased personnel needs is inadequate, performing-arts instruction is not accommodated, and…
Descriptors: Block Scheduling, Flexible Scheduling, High Schools, Principals

Geismar, Thomas J.; Pullease, Barbara G. – NASSP Bulletin, 1996
Compares achievement of students attending a large Florida high school under a traditional schedule during 1993-94 and a trimester block schedule during the following year. Passing grades have gone up 3.7%. Regarding Scholastic Aptitude Test and American College Testing results, there was no significant difference. Teachers, students, parents, and…
Descriptors: Block Scheduling, High Schools, Instructional Improvement, Program Implementation
Hottenstein, David S. – School Administrator, 1999
Administrators must research diverse scheduling alternatives and their effects and requirements. Successfully modifying school time boils down to a six-step recipe: believing in improvement-directed change, involving all key stakeholders, selecting the appropriate schedule, developing clear expectations, bridging the theory-practice gap, and…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Block Scheduling, Flexible Scheduling, Guidelines

Winn, Deanna D.; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1997
Describes a committee's efforts to revamp schedules to improve their high school's elective course options, provide equitable teacher-preparation time, and use instructional time productively. From three viable schedules (a four-period block, alternating-day schedule; a five-period trimester with a flexible period; and a modified trimester plan…
Descriptors: Alternate Day Schedules, Block Scheduling, Committees, Creativity

Kramer, Steven L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1997
A study of British Columbia high schools found that block scheduling can endanger mathematics achievement. Reduced math scores were attributed to irregular planning time, little opportunity to modify curriculum; and the provincial examination system. Longer time blocks cannot succeed without adequate planning time, curricular restructuring, and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Block Scheduling, Foreign Countries, High Schools

Queen, J. Allen; Isenhour, Kimberly Gaskey – NASSP Bulletin, 1998
If administrators fail to seek faculty support for block scheduling, teachers may feel undervalued, angry, and adversarial. When principals allow teacher committees to take leadership roles, teachers can assume ownership of the new model. Adminstrators must establish teacher confidence in transitions, maintain effective communication, monitor…
Descriptors: Administrator Behavior, Administrator Responsibility, Block Scheduling, Change Strategies