NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Minturn, Eric B.; Lansky, Leonard M. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972
A trainerless laboratory model wherein the trainer never attends is presented. The discussion includes the advantages and disadvantages of the model, evidence for its effectiveness, and implications for the future of training. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Experience, Laboratory Training, Models, Trainers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lomranz, Jacob; And Others – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972
As a result of experienced group leaders' responses to and observations of interaction scenarios, three distinct and highly interpretable groups in terms of practices, purposes, and processes are discussed. (BY)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Experience, Leadership, Leadership Qualities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sampson, Edward E. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972
By extending Fiedler's conception of leader orientation, it was hypothesized that groups led by trainers oriented toward the group members most liked by their group are more effective-in terms of member satisfaction and achievement of group goals-than group trainers oriented toward least-liked members of their group. This hypothesis was tested by…
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Group Dynamics, Interpersonal Relationship, Sensitivity Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Luke, Robert A., Jr. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1972
This study attempts to articulate the internal normative structure of sensitivity training groups by identifying the normative patterns that govern member behavior and by examining the relative influence exercised by trainer and member over the establishment and maintenance of group norms. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Group Norms, Group Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lundgren, David C. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
Developmental trends in two 10-man training groups were studied by checklist and rating scale techniques throughout a four-day laboratory. Differences in the developmental patterns of the two T Groups are interpreted as consequences of the contrasting approaches of the trainers. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Groups, Sensitivity Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Peter B. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
The article concludes that authority oriented groups and trainers were least successful. Significant linkages have been found between data oriented trainers and two learning goals, and between people oriented trainers and two other goals. (Author)
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Behavior Change, Goal Orientation, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bolman, Lee – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
Among the effects of trainers on their T Groups was that trainer empathy and security were related to liking for the trainer and perceived member learning. Trainer affection, tendencies to reward and punish, and openess showed no or little relationship to participant learning. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Empathy, Group Dynamics, Human Relations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frankiel, Harry H. – Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1971
In the present study, members of two trainer groups did not form relationships which were both mutually therapeutic and confronting so frequently as did members of one trainer groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship