Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 5 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
Language Learning & Technology | 7 |
Author
Abrams, Zsuzsanna I. | 1 |
Dongkawang Shin | 1 |
Emily A. Hellmich | 1 |
Eun Seon Chung | 1 |
Jin, Tan | 1 |
Kimberly Vinall | 1 |
Lai, Chun | 1 |
Li, Jinrong | 1 |
Li, Mimi | 1 |
Liu, Fengkai | 1 |
Lodzikowski, Kacper | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 7 |
Postsecondary Education | 6 |
Audience
Location
China | 1 |
Poland | 1 |
South Korea | 1 |
South Korea (Seoul) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Emily A. Hellmich; Kimberly Vinall – Language Learning & Technology, 2023
The use of machine translation (MT) tools remains controversial among language instructors, with limited integration into classroom practices. While much of the existing research into MT and language education has explored instructor perceptions, less is known about how students actually use MT or how student use compares to instructor beliefs and…
Descriptors: Translation, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Computational Linguistics
Dongkawang Shin; Yuah V. Chon – Language Learning & Technology, 2023
Considering noticeable improvements in the accuracy of Google Translate recently, the aim of this study was to examine second language (L2) learners' ability to use post-editing (PE) strategies when applying AI tools such as the neural machine translator (MT) to solve their lexical and grammatical problems during L2 writing. This study examined 57…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Translation, Computer Software
Eun Seon Chung – Language Learning & Technology, 2024
While previous investigations on online machine translation (MT) in language learning have analyzed how second language (L2) learners use and post-edit MT output, no study as of yet has investigated how the learners process MT errors and what factors affect this process using response and reading times. The present study thus investigates L2…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Korean, Language Processing, Translation
Abrams, Zsuzsanna I. – Language Learning & Technology, 2019
Linking research on task-based collaborative L2 writing and computer-mediated writing, this study investigates the relationship between patterns of collaboration and the linguistic features of texts written during a computer-supported collaborative writing task using Google Docs. Qualitative analyses provide insights into the writing process of…
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Computer Software, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Lodzikowski, Kacper – Language Learning & Technology, 2021
This is the first paper that provides correlational evidence about how interacting with an online allophonic transcription tool helps learners of English as a Second Language (ESL) to improve their phonological awareness. The study investigates 55 advanced ESL learners at a Polish university enrolled in a course in English phonetics and phonology.…
Descriptors: Correlation, Phonological Awareness, Scores, Second Language Learning
Li, Jinrong; Li, Mimi – Language Learning & Technology, 2018
Despite the benefits of peer review, there are still challenges that need to be addressed to make it more effective for L2 students. With the development of technology, computer-mediated peer review has captured increasing attention from L2 writing researchers and instructors. While Turnitin is known for its use in detecting plagiarism, its newly…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction
Shi, Zhan; Liu, Fengkai; Lai, Chun; Jin, Tan – Language Learning & Technology, 2022
Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) systems have been found to enhance the accuracy, readability, and cohesion of writing responses (Stevenson & Phakiti, 2019). Previous research indicates that individual learners may have difficulty utilizing content-based AWE feedback and collaborative processing of feedback might help to cope with this…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Accuracy