Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Simulation | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Estimation (Mathematics) | 1 |
| Expert Systems | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Measurement in… | 1 |
Author
| Enders, Craig K. | 1 |
| Finney, Sara J. | 1 |
| Freeman, Sharon A. | 1 |
| Luk, HingKwan | 1 |
| Severance, Donald D. | 1 |
| Wise, Steven L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| College Board Achievement… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWise, Steven L.; Finney, Sara J.; Enders, Craig K.; Freeman, Sharon A.; Severance, Donald D. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1999
Examined whether providing item review on a computerized adaptive test could be used by examinees to inflate their scores. Two studies involving 139 undergraduates suggest that examinees are not highly proficient at discriminating item difficulty. A simulation study showed the usefulness of a strategy identified by G. Kingsbury (1996) as a way to…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Higher Education
Luk, HingKwan – 1991
This study examined whether an expert system approach involving intelligent selection of items (EXSPRT-I) is as efficient as item response theory (IRT) based three-parameter adaptive mastery testing (AMT) when there are enough subjects to estimate the three IRT item parameters for all items in the test and when subjects in the item parameter…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis
