Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Simulation | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Timed Tests | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Computer Security | 1 |
| Culture Fair Tests | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Assessment & Evaluation in… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Item Order and Speededness: Implications for Test Fairness in Higher Educational High-Stakes Testing
Peer reviewed
Direct linkBecker, Benjamin; van Rijn, Peter; Molenaar, Dylan; Debeer, Dries – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
A common approach to increase test security in higher educational high-stakes testing is the use of different test forms with identical items but different item orders. The effects of such varied item orders are relatively well studied, but findings have generally been mixed. When multiple test forms with different item orders are used, we argue…
Descriptors: Information Security, High Stakes Tests, Computer Security, Test Items
Lazarte, Alejandro A. – 1999
Two experiments reproduced in a simulated computerized test-taking situation the effect of two of the main determinants in answering an item in a test: the difficulty of the item and the time available to answer it. A model is proposed for the time to respond or abandon an item and for the probability of abandoning it or answering it correctly. In…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Higher Education, Probability
