NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bramley, Tom – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
There is something about the topic of validity that seems to provoke dissatisfaction in many of those who encounter it--a sense that something is not right, and that something needs to be done to sort it out. Paul E. Newton in his target essay does not attempt a radical reconstruction of the validity edifice. His position is that the "consensus…
Descriptors: Validity, Measurement, Construct Validity, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haig, Brian D. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Lee Cronbach once expressed the view that all roads lead to construct validity. In looking to clarify the consensus definition of validity, and its place in assessment, Newton is also led to the troublesome idea of construct validity. To be sure, he addresses other validity issues, but in this commentary, I will restrict my attention to construct…
Descriptors: Validity, Educational Assessment, Construct Validity, Definitions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maraun, Michael D. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
As illuminated forcefully by Professor Newton's provocative analytical and historical excursion, as long as tests are employed to practical ends (prediction, selection, etc.) there is little cause for the metatheoretic angst that occasions rounds of papers on the topic of validity. But then, also, there seems little need, within this context of…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Test Validity, Validity, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kane, Michael – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Paul E. Newton's article on the consensus definition of validity tackles a number of big issues and makes a number of strong claims. I agreed with much of what he said, and I disagreed with a number of his claims, but I found his article to be consistently interesting and thought provoking (whether I agreed or not). I will focus on three general…
Descriptors: Validity, Construct Validity, Tests, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lissitz, Robert W.; Calico, Tiago – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
This paper presents the authors' critique on "Clarifying the Consensus Definition of Validity" by Paul E. Newton (this issue). There are serious differences of opinion regarding the topic of validity. Newton is aware of these differences, as made clear by his choice of references and particularly his effort to respond to the various Borsboom…
Descriptors: Concept Formation, Test Construction, Test Validity, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Newton, Paul E. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
The 1999 "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" defines validity as the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores entailed by proposed uses of tests. Although quite explicit, there are ways in which this definition lacks precision, consistency, and clarity. The history of validity has taught us…
Descriptors: Evidence, Validity, Educational Testing, Risk