NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Audience
Researchers2
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
School to Work Opportunities…1
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 40 results Save | Export
Segal, Jay S. – Health Education (Washington D.C.), 1977
The Segal Interaction Analysis Scale (SIAS)--a categorization of verbal behaviors--is described and its uses indicated for promoting effective and productive group discussions. (MB)
Descriptors: Classification, Communication Skills, Discussion Groups, Group Dynamics
McCroskey, James C.; Wright, David W. – Speech Monographs, 1971
The purpose of this study was the development and testing of an instrument for measuring interaction behavior in small group communication. It was designed to produce valid and reliable measures for each dimension of such behavior. (Author/JB)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Amidon, Edmund; Kavanaugh, Raphael R. – Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1979
The Levels of Verbal Intimacy Technique (LOVIT) is an instrument for the analysis of verbal statements along a continuum from most intimate to least intimate. It enables an observer to place all verbal statements in one of 10 categories along this intimacy continuum. The technique has been used in research. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Guides, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mabry, Edward A. – Human Communication Research, 1975
Examines patterns of oral communication in encounter groups and identifies three stages of group life: boundary-seeking, ambivalence and actualization. (MH)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Regula, C. Robert; Julian, James W. – Journal of Social Psychology, 1973
The importance of talkativeness or the relative frequency of contributing to task interaction was examined as a factor which determines person perception. Quantity but not quality of task contributions was significantly related to the attribution of creativity and influence over others. (Author/JB)
Descriptors: Achievement, Behavioral Science Research, Group Dynamics, Interaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bradley, Patricia Hayes; And Others – Journal of Communication, 1976
Reviews a study indicating that articulate deviates expressing themselves within the context of informal group discussions are capable of exerting considerable influence on the opinions of others. (MH)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Dissent, Group Discussion, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ferrara, Joseph W. – Journal of Social Psychology, 1973
The prototype verbal interaction recording technique described is used for studying individuals in small groups. A methodology for recording verbal interaction is developed in an effort to create a system for analyzing interpersonal and social forces in operation within groups. (SM)
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, Codification, Data Collection, Group Dynamics
Zimet, Carl N.; Schneider, Carol – J Soc Psychol, 1969
Sponsored by National Institute of Mental Health grant MH-08274.
Descriptors: Discussion Groups, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Group Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Daley, John A.; And Others – Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1977
Discusses a study designed to investigate the relationships between vocal activity level and interpersonal attraction, perceived credibility, perceived homophily or interpersonal similarity and perceived power or ability to influence. (MH)
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Credibility, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goldman, Morton; And Others – Journal of Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Behavioral Science Research, College Students, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bochner, Arthur P.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The willingness to manipulate others has been called Machiavellianism. The purpose of the present study was to acquire a preliminary answer to the question: what verbal communicative strategies do people with high Machiavellian characteristics employ which permit them to influence and control the group process? (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior, Communication (Thought Transfer), Group Dynamics, Individual Power
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Conyne, Robert K.; Rapin, Lynn S. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study compared the effectiveness of facilitator-directed and self-directed personal growth group treatments toward inducing therapeutic verbal interaction. An interaction process analysis approach, the Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM) statement-by-statement system, was used to examine treatment differences. (Author)
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Leadership Styles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stymne, Ingrid – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1982
Analyzes and categorizes directional factors, and exploratory sequences related to them, via videotaped sessions of two teenage school work groups. Shows stimuli which initiate exploratory sequences are found for all directional factors in problem solving or decision making. Reveals rule-governed or routinized behavior relates to directional…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Cues, Decision Making, Group Dynamics
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Timmis, John H., III – 1975
Symbolic interaction is the foundation for a theory of rhetoric developed in this paper. As manipulators of symbols, humans, unlike all other animals, use abstractions both to indicate (describe things present) and to represent (describe intangible things). Only human beings are capable of the elaborate systems of linguistic reference called…
Descriptors: Behavior Theories, Communication (Thought Transfer), Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Burks, Don M.; Hart, Roderick P. – 1973
Confrontation, or aggressive verbal behavior, has been defended as a rhetorical tactic by some communication theorists on five bases: biological, psychological, sociological, rhetorical, and intellectual. Proponents of "rhetorical sensitivity," however, differ from those who would accept confrontation uncritically. Confrontation is not…
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Communication (Thought Transfer), Emotional Response, Group Dynamics
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3