NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Warne, Russell T. – Multicultural Education, 2009
Recently this journal published a research article examining the effectiveness of three different tests in identifying ethnically diverse gifted and talented children (Lewis, DeCamp-Fritson, Ramage, McFarland, & Archwamety, 2007, Volume 15, Number 1, pp. 38-42). After examining the proportions of Caucasian and non-Caucasian children identified…
Descriptors: Multicultural Education, Comparative Analysis, Gifted, Talent Identification
Lunneborg, Clifford E. – 1977
Just as the Raven Progressive Matrices Test was uncorrelated in this sample with other measures of intelligence so was it much less well predicted from several information processing measures. It was found that verbal performance, indicated by a vocabulary score, was highly predictable from measures of information processing. While preserving…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Correlation, Intelligence Tests
Nasca, Donald – 1988
Concern about the possible bias of using only verbal assessments for the identification of intellectually gifted students led to an examination of the effect of incorporating nonverbal assessments of intelligence into the identification process. Two nonverbal instruments (Progressive Matrices and Test of Nonverbal Intelligence) were used in…
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Aptitude Tests, Cognitive Measurement, Comparative Analysis
Purl, Mabel C.; Curtis, Jonathan – 1970
The relationship of the Progressive Matrices Test (PM) to the Lorge-Thorndike Intelligence Test (LTIQ) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) is examined. Predictive power of these measures with respect to a number of achievement measures was also investigated. The initial sample consisted of 242 first graders and 281 second…
Descriptors: Anglo Americans, Blacks, Comparative Analysis, Correlation
Zimowski, Michele F.; Wothke, Werner – 1987
Tests of spatial ability were analyzed for their analog (visuospatial) and nonanalog (verbal reasoning) components, using factor analyses of items and test scores. The self-selected sample consisted of over 2000 clients (average age about 26 or 27) employing the Johnson O'Connor Research Foundation's aptitude evaluation services in 12 metropolitan…
Descriptors: Adults, Aptitude Tests, Content Validity, Factor Analysis