Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Verbal Tests | 8 |
| Intelligence Tests | 7 |
| Performance Tests | 3 |
| Preschool Children | 3 |
| Children | 2 |
| Exceptional Child Education | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Intelligence | 2 |
| Nonverbal Tests | 2 |
| Preschool Education | 2 |
| Preschool Tests | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 8 |
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 3 |
| Bayley Scales of Infant… | 1 |
| Kaufman Assessment Battery… | 1 |
| Leiter International… | 1 |
| Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkBlaga, Otilia M.; Shaddy, D. Jill; Anderson, Christa J.; Kannass, Kathleen N.; Little, Todd D.; Colombo, John – Intelligence, 2009
We evaluated over 200 participants semiannually from 12 to 48 months of age on measures of intellectual (Bayley Scales, Stanford-Binet Scale) and verbal (MacArthur-Bates Inventory, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test) status. Structural equation modeling and hierarchical linear (growth curve) analyses were applied to address the nature of development…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Preschool Children, Infants, Intellectual Development
Download full textPORTER, PHILIP J.; AND OTHERS – 1965
BEGINNING WITH A REVIEW OF THE NURSERY SCHOOL MOVEMENT (FROEBEL, MONTESSORI, AND MCMILLAN,) THIS EVALUATION RELATES THE HISTORICAL MATERIAL TO HEAD START, SPECIFICALLY IN CAMBRIDGE MASS. DURING THE SUMMER OF 1965, MATCHED GROUPS OF 33 HEAD START CHILDREN AND 33 NON-HEAD START CHILDREN (CONTROL GROUP) WERE STUDIED. SCHOOL PRE-REGISTRATION LISTS…
Descriptors: Group Behavior, Poverty, Preschool Education, Preschool Evaluation
Coleman, Howard M.; Dawson, Sarah Taylor – J Learning Disabilities, 1969
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Education, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities, Perceptual Handicaps
CONTRUCCI, VICTOR J.; AND OTHERS – 1962
FOUR COMMONLY USED INDIVIDUAL INTELLIGENCE TESTS ARE DESCRIBED. DESCRIPTIONS OF SUBTESTS ARE GIVEN, ALONG WITH EXPLANATION OF WHAT EACH TEST MEASURES. THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO ASSIST THE TEACHER IN IDENTIFYING SPECIFIC ABILITIES AND WEAKNESSES IN INDIVIDUAL CHILDREN. (JW)
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Measurement Instruments
Smith, Douglas K.; Bauer, Joseph J. – 1989
The Stanford-Binet (Fourth Edition) (S-B:FE) and Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) were administered in counterbalanced order to a sample of 30 non-handicapped, preschool children (13 males and 17 females). The children ranged in age from 3 years 11 months to 6 years 2 months, with a mean age of 4 years 11 months. Mean scores on the…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Factor Analysis, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedLaurent, Jeff; And Others – Psychological Assessment, 1992
Validity studies conducted with the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (SB:FE) are reviewed. Results support its validity as a measure of general mental ability and that it can distinguish between groups of youngsters with differing intellectual abilities. Recommendations are made for use of the SB:FE. (SLD)
Descriptors: Children, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Intelligence
ALLEN, ROBERT M.; ALLEN, SUE P. – 1967
DESIGNED FOR THE PSYCHOLOGIST, THE HANDBOOK DESCRIBES INSTRUMENTS COMMONLY USED FOR INTELLECTUAL EVALUATION OF CHILDREN SUSPECTED OF BEING MENTALLY RETARDED. INFORMATION IS GIVEN CONCERNING DEFIITIONS, IDENTIFICATION, AND CHARACTERISITICS OF MENTAL RETARDATION, TEST SELECTION, AND THE TEST SITUATION. TESTS DESCRIBED AND DISCUSSED INCLUDE…
Descriptors: Adults, Blindness, Children, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewedHeath, Linda – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1979
The effects of the changing nature of intelligence test items during the follow-up period for compensatory education program evaluations on the judgments about program effectiveness are examined. Data from the Stanford-Binet and from three compensatory education evaluations, are examined. Methods for dealing with differential validity are…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth
