Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 2 |
| Eye Movements | 2 |
| Reading Processes | 2 |
| Sentences | 2 |
| Vision | 2 |
| Visual Acuity | 2 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Language Processing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWhite, Sarah J.; Warren, Tessa; Reichle, Erik D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2011
Two experiments examined parafoveal preview for words located in the middle of sentences and at sentence boundaries. Parafoveal processing was shown to occur for words at sentence-initial, mid-sentence, and sentence-final positions. Both Experiments 1 and 2 showed reduced effects of preview on regressions out for sentence-initial words. In…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Vision, Visual Acuity, Reader Text Relationship
Angele, Bernhard; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2011
We used the boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) to test two hypotheses that might explain why no conclusive evidence has been found for the existence of n + 2 preprocessing effects. In Experiment 1, we tested whether parafoveal processing of the second word to the right of fixation (n + 2) takes place only when the preceding word (n + 1) is very…
Descriptors: Models, Hypothesis Testing, Evidence, Vision
