Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Visual Discrimination | 3 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Mental Retardation | 2 |
Visual Perception | 2 |
Ability Identification | 1 |
Auditory Discrimination | 1 |
Autism | 1 |
Brain | 1 |
Cognitive Style | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Deafness | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Intellectual… | 3 |
Author
Berry-Kravis, E. | 1 |
Boutet, I. | 1 |
Cornish, K. | 1 |
Drouin, A. | 1 |
Graham, G. E. | 1 |
Kogan, C. S. | 1 |
Maljaars, J. P. W. | 1 |
Milgram, N. W. | 1 |
Noens, I. L. J. | 1 |
Reyer, H. S. | 1 |
Scholte, E. M. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Maljaars, J. P. W.; Noens, I. L. J.; Scholte, E. M.; Verpoorten, R. A. W.; van Berckelaer-Onnes, I. A. – Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 2011
Background: The ComFor study has indicated that individuals with intellectual disability (ID) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show enhanced visual local processing compared with individuals with ID only. Items of the ComFor with meaningless materials provided the best discrimination between the two samples. These results can be explained by the…
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Rhetoric, Mental Retardation, Autism
Kogan, C. S.; Boutet, I.; Cornish, K.; Graham, G. E.; Berry-Kravis, E.; Drouin, A.; Milgram, N. W. – Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 2009
Background: Standardised neuropsychological and cognitive measures present some limitations in their applicability and generalisability to individuals with intellectual disability (ID). Alternative approaches to defining the cognitive signatures of various forms of ID are needed to advance our understanding of the profiles of strengths and…
Descriptors: Mental Retardation, Down Syndrome, Short Term Memory, Recognition (Psychology)
Reyer, H. S.; Sturmey, P. – Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 2006
Background: Prior studies have showed that presentation methods could affect the accuracy of a choice assessment. Methods: In the current study, high- and low- preferred work tasks were identified in nine adults with developmental disabilities. Both tasks were then introduced in pairs within a choice assessment using the actual tasks, pictures of…
Descriptors: Predictor Variables, Developmental Disabilities, Task Analysis, Discrimination Learning