NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)14
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 37 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Liefooghe, Baptist; Hughes, Sean; Schmidt, James R.; De Houwer, Jan – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
Automaticity can be established by consistently reinforcing contingencies during practice. During reinforcement learning, however, new relations can also be derived, which were never directly reinforced. For instance, reinforcing the overlapping contingencies A [right arrow] B and A [right arrow] C, can lead to a new relation B-C, which was never…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Visual Stimuli, Interference (Learning), Reaction Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bourret, Jason C.; Iwata, Brian A.; Harper, Jill M.; North, Stephen T. – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2012
Five individuals with autism or other developmental disabilities participated in paired-stimulus preference assessments during repeated baseline probes. All subjects initially showed a pronounced bias by typically selecting the stimulus placed in either the left or right position. Biased responding for 3 subjects was eliminated when training…
Descriptors: Autism, Developmental Disabilities, Reinforcement, Mental Retardation
Love, Jessica June – ProQuest LLC, 2013
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of PECS phase III application training on independent mands in young children with autism. Participants were five children with autism ranging from ages 2 to 4 years old. A multiple baseline across participants was used to evaluate acquisition of independent correct mands across baseline and…
Descriptors: Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Young Children, Verbal Operant Conditioning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Campos, Heloisa Cursi; Debert, Paula; Barros, Romariz da Silva; McIlvane, William J. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2011
A go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli typically establishes emergent behavior that parallels in structure and typical outcome that of conventional tests for symmetric, transitive, and equivalence relations in normally capable adults. The present study employed a go/no-go compound stimulus procedure with pigeons. During training, pecks to…
Descriptors: Visual Stimuli, Mental Retardation, Animals, Animal Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Daum, Moritz M.; Prinz, Wolfgang; Aschersleben, Gisa – Infancy, 2009
In 2 experiments, the interplay of action perception and action production was investigated in 6-month-old infants. In Experiment 1, infants received 2 versions of a means-end task in counterbalanced order. In the action perception version, a preferential looking paradigm in which infants were shown an actor performing means-end behavior with an…
Descriptors: Infants, Toys, Visual Stimuli, Reinforcement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hogan, Lindsey C.; Bell, Matthew; Olson, Ryan – Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2009
The vigilance reinforcement hypothesis (VRH) asserts that errors in signal detection tasks are partially explained by operant reinforcement and extinction processes. VRH predictions were tested with a computerized baggage screening task. Our experiment evaluated the effects of signal schedule (extinction vs. variable interval 6 min) and visual…
Descriptors: Air Transportation, Security Personnel, Screening Tests, Reinforcement
Murphy, Carol; Barnes-Holmes, Dermot – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2009
In Experiment 1, "more" and "less" relations were trained for arbitrary Stimuli A1 and A2 with 3 children with autism. The following conditional discriminations were then trained: A1-B1, A2-B2, B1-C1, B2-C2. In subsequent tests, participants showed derived more-less mands (mand with C1 for more and mand with C2 for less). A training procedure…
Descriptors: Transfer of Training, Feedback (Response), Autism, Operant Conditioning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Singer, Rebecca A.; Berry, Laura M.; Zentall, Thomas R. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2007
Several types of contrast effects have been identified including incentive contrast, anticipatory contrast, and behavioral contrast. Clement, Feltus, Kaiser, and Zentall (2000) proposed a type of contrast that appears to be different from these others and called it within-trial contrast. In this form of contrast the relative value of a reinforcer…
Descriptors: Preferences, Stimuli, Reinforcement, Animals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Urcuioli, Peter J. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2008
Five experiments assessed associative symmetry in pigeons. In Experiments 1A, 1B and 2, pigeons learned two-alternative symbolic matching with identical sample- and comparison-response requirements and with matching stimuli appearing in all possible locations. Despite controlling for the nature of the functional stimuli and insuring all requisite…
Descriptors: Animals, Animal Behavior, Behavioral Science Research, Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Simer, Nancy; Cuvo, Anthony J. – Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2009
The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends vision screening of all children between 3 and 5 years of age, and states have mandated vision screening for all school children. Participants were three 4-6-year old school children with either a developmental delay or autism who scored "could not test" on the state required vision screening.…
Descriptors: Intervention, Vision Tests, Developmental Disabilities, Visual Discrimination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Andrzejewski, Matthew E.; Terry-Cain, Shelly; Bersh, Philip J. – Psychological Record, 2004
In a first series of experiments, 9 groups of rats were exposed to 30 20-minute sessions of successive visual discrimination training ("go/no-go," or mult FR-1 ext), where components ([S.sup.D] and [S.sup.[DELTA]]) were equal (1 min) in length. Responses during [S.sup.D] were reinforced with a nonresetting delay (Experiment 1a) or a resetting…
Descriptors: Reinforcement, Control Groups, Visual Discrimination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Young, Michael E.; Beckmann, Joshua S.; Wasserman, Edward A. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2006
We trained four pigeons to discriminate a Michotte launching animation from three other animations using a go/no-go task. The pigeons received food for pecking at one of the animations, but not for pecking at the others. The four animations featured two types of interactions among objects: causal (direct launching) and noncausal (delayed, distal,…
Descriptors: Interaction, Animal Behavior, Animals, Behavioral Science Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alsop, Brent; Porritt, Melissa – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2006
Three pigeons discriminated between two sample stimuli (intensities of red light). The difficulty of the discrimination was varied over four levels. At each level, the relative reinforcer magnitude for the two correct responses was varied across conditions, and the reinforcer rates were equal. Within levels, discriminability between the sample…
Descriptors: Visual Stimuli, Reinforcement, Animals, Animal Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chelonis, John J.; Bastilla, Jairo E.; Brown, Melissa M.; Gardner, Eunice S. – Psychological Record, 2007
The present study examined how the magnitude of time-out duration following incorrect responses affected the ability of adults to learn simple visual discriminations. Sixty-four college students were randomly assigned to one of four groups that received a 0-, 5-, 10-, or 20-s time-out duration after an incorrect response. Each participant…
Descriptors: Visual Discrimination, Timeout, Conceptual Tempo, Time Factors (Learning)
Cunningham, Thomas F. – J Exp Child Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Handicapped Children, Institutionalized Persons, Mental Retardation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3