NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Brazilian Adaptation of the Woodcock-Johnson III Cognitive Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wechsler, Solange Muglia; Nunes, Carlos Sancineto; Schelini, Patricia Waltz; Pasian, Sonia Regina; Homsi, Silvia Vertoni; Moretti, Lucia; Anache, Alexandra Ayach – School Psychology International, 2010
An adaptation of the standard battery of Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ-III) for Brazilian children and youth was investigated. The sample was composed of 1094 students (54 percent girls), ages 7-17, living in Sao Paulo state (91 percent). Items from Brazilian school books as well as from the WJ-III Spanish version…
Descriptors: Syllables, Visual Learning, Cognitive Tests, Auditory Tests
General and Specific Effects on Cattell-Horn-Carroll Broad Ability Composites: Analysis of the Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update Cattell-Horn-Carroll Factor Clusters across Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Floyd, Randy G.; McGrew, Kevin S.; Barry, Amberly; Rafael, Fawziya; Rogers, Joshua – School Psychology Review, 2009
Many school psychologists focus their interpretation on composite scores from intelligence test batteries designed to measure the broad abilities from the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory. The purpose of this study was to investigate the general factor loadings and specificity of the broad ability composite scores from one such intelligence test…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Psychologists, School Psychologists, Intelligence Tests
A Comparison of Visual and Auditory Processing Tests on the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability, Revised and the Learning Efficiency Test-II.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bolen, L. M.; Kimball, D. J.; Hall, C. W.; Webster, R. E. – Psychology in the Schools, 1997
Compares the visual and auditory processing factors of the Woodcock Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability, Revised (WJR COG) and the visual and auditory memory factors of the Learning Efficiency Test, II (LET-II) among 120 college students. Results indicate two significant performance differences between the WJR COG and LET-II. (RJM)
Descriptors: Aural Learning, Cognitive Style, College Students, Comparative Analysis