Descriptor
Source
Equity and Choice | 7 |
Author
Clinchy, Evans | 1 |
Davies, Don | 1 |
Foote, Edward T. II | 1 |
La Pierre, D. Bruce | 1 |
Lines, Patricia M. | 1 |
Uchitelle, Susan | 1 |
Zerchykov, Ross | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - General | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Massachusetts | 2 |
Massachusetts (Boston) | 1 |
Massachusetts (Cambridge) | 1 |
Missouri (Saint Louis) | 1 |
New York (Buffalo) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Clinchy, Evans – Equity and Choice, 1986
Reports on teacher, principal, parent, and student reactions to a desegregation plan implemented in Buffalo, New York, which permits teachers to choose the magnet schools in which they desire to teach and parents to select their children's schools. (GC)
Descriptors: Desegregation Plans, Elementary Secondary Education, Magnet Schools, Parent School Relationship
Davies, Don – Equity and Choice, 1986
Discusses questions about Massachusetts magnet schools, including (1) reaching parents who do not choose magnets; (2) how the school affects different groups of children; (3) how equity is embodied in life at school; (4) how magnet schools achieve unity; (5) whether parent choice leads to parental empowerment; and (6) why the magnet schools have…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Magnet Schools, Parent Role
Lines, Patricia M. – Equity and Choice, 1986
Focuses on the application of a targeted and regulated voucher system to the problems of racial segregation. Suggests that under a regulated voucher system, minorities (Chapter 1 students, in particular) have a better chance of obtaining both the racial balance and the school characteristics they desire. (Author/GC)
Descriptors: Educational Vouchers, Elementary Secondary Education, Equal Education, Minority Groups
Uchitelle, Susan; And Others – Equity and Choice, 1984
Describes the voluntary, interdistrict transfer plan implemented to accomplish desegregation in the public schools in the St. Louis, Missouri, metropolitan area. (GC)
Descriptors: Desegregation Effects, Desegregation Plans, Educational Quality, Elementary Secondary Education
La Pierre, D. Bruce – Equity and Choice, 1988
The state of Missouri opposed the desegregation plan in St. Louis but the court approved it. Three components of the plan are the following: (1) voluntary interdistrict transfers; (2) magnet schools; and (3) improvement of the quality of education and major capital improvements. Implementation and achievements are described. (VM)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Court Role, Desegregation Plans, Educational Improvement
Zerchykov, Ross – Equity and Choice, 1986
Presents and discusses enrollment statistics for nine Massachusetts school systems undergoing desegregation. Focuses on Boston, Worcester, Springfield, Lowell, and Cambridge. Describes each system as successfully promoting desegregation through magnet schools and parental choice. (KH)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Enrollment, Magnet Schools, Parent Participation
Foote, Edward T. II – Equity and Choice, 1988
The human drama in beginning St. Louis's desegregation plan is presented. As the chair of a citizen's committee, the author worked with the superintendent and the Board of Education to create a plan. Implementation was accomplished in a few months. The desegregation of suburban districts was settled in court. (VM)
Descriptors: Citizen Participation, County School Districts, Court Litigation, Desegregation Plans