NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Koo, Hahn; Callahan, Lydia – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2012
One hypothesis raised by Newport and Aslin to explain how speakers learn dependencies between nonadjacent phonemes is that speakers track bigram probabilities between two segments that are adjacent to each other within a tier of their own. The hypothesis predicts that a dependency between segments separated from each other at the tier level cannot…
Descriptors: Probability, Phonemes, Experiments, Vowels
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Hsin-Chin; Vaid, Jyotsna – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2007
Do native readers segment polysyllabic words based on orthographic/morphological criteria or phonological criteria? Research by Taft (1979, 2001) argues in support of the former, as readers were faster in split-word lexical decision tasks when the words were segmented by orthographic/ morphological principles based on Basic Orthographic Syllable…
Descriptors: Word Frequency, Syllables, Word Recognition, Orthographic Symbols
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Norris, Dennis; McQueen, James M.; Cutler, Anne; Butterfield, Sally; Kearns, Ruth – Language and Cognitive Processes, 2001
Two word-spotting experiments are reported that examine whether the Possible-Word Constraint (PWC) is a language-specific or language-universal strategy for the segmentation of continuous speech. Examined cases where the residue was either a CVC syllable with a Schwa or a CV syllable with a lax vowel. Showed that the word-spotting results…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Language Universals, Oral Language, Phonology