NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sun, Shan-Shan; Tao, Jian; Chang, Hua-Hua; Shi, Ning-Zhong – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
For mixed-type tests composed of dichotomous and polytomous items, polytomous items often yield more information than dichotomous items. To reflect the difference between the two types of items and to improve the precision of ability estimation, an adaptive weighted maximum-a-posteriori (WMAP) estimation is proposed. To evaluate the performance of…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Computation, Item Response Theory, Weighted Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Claudy, John G. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Option weighting is an alternative to increasing test length as a means of improving the reliability of a test. The effects on test reliability of option weighting procedures were compared in two empirical studies using four independent sets of items. Biserial weights were found to be superior. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Item Analysis, Scoring Formulas, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baker, Frank B. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1993
Using simulation, the effect that misspecification of elements in the weight matrix has on estimates of basic parameters of the linear logistic test model was studied. Results indicate that, because specifying elements of the weight matrix is a subjective process, it must be done with great care. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error Patterns, Estimation (Mathematics), Item Response Theory, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kane, Michael; Moloney, James – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
The answer-until-correct (AUC) procedure requires that examinees respond to a multi-choice item until they answer it correctly. Using a modified version of Horst's model for examinee behavior, this paper compares the effect of guessing on item reliability for the AUC procedure and the zero-one scoring procedure. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Item Analysis, Mathematical Models, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Davison, Mark L.; Robbins, Stephen – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1978
Empirically weighted scores for Rest's Defining Issues Test were found to be more reliable than the simple sum of scores theoretically weighted sum, or Rest's p scores. They also had slightly higher correlations with Kohlberg's interview scores. Empirically weighted scores also showed more significant change in two longitudinal studies. (CTM)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Longitudinal Studies, Moral Development, Moral Values
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rozeboom, William W. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
Formulas are provided for estimating the reliability of a linear composite of non-equivalent subtests given the reliabilities of component subtests. The reliability of the composite is compared to that of its components. An empirical example uses data from 170 children aged 4 through 8 years performing 34 Piagetian tasks. (SLD)
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Equations (Mathematics), Estimation (Mathematics), Mathematical Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Downey, Ronald G. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979
This research attempted to interrelate several methods of producing option weights (i.e., Guttman internal and external weights and judges' weights) and examined their effects on reliability and on concurrent, predictive, and face validity. It was concluded that option weighting offered limited, if any, improvement over unit weighting. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Answer Keys, Comparative Testing, High Schools