NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nemecek, Paul M. – Clearing House, 1994
Maintains that a weighted grading system may be more suitable in situations where traditional grading seems inadequate. Describes two categories of weighted systems: the multiplicative system and the additive system. (SR)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rogers, Erleen Joiner – Clearing House, 1994
Describes a program developed at Christian County High School in Hopkinsville, Kentucky, that utilizes three different levels of instruction with two different curriculums under each level to meet the differing needs of students. (SR)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Grading, High Schools, Program Descriptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nemecek, Paul M. – Clearing House, 1978
When traditional grading seems inadequate, a weighted grading system may be more suitable. But a school district interested in trying a weighted system must devise a program reflecting its own needs. Two categories of weighted systems, designated here the multiplicative system and the additive system, are considered. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Grades (Scholastic), Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ornstein, Allan C. – Clearing House, 1989
Discusses grading in elementary and secondary schools, focusing on the following topics: combining and weighting data, grading criteria, absolute grade standards, relative grade standards, contracting for grades, mastery and continuous progress grading, grading for effort or improvement, report cards, and procedures for grading students. (SR)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Grades (Scholastic), Grading