NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 33 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moses, Tim – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2014
In this study, smoothing and scaling approaches are compared for estimating subscore-to-composite scaling results involving composites computed as rounded and weighted combinations of subscores. The considered smoothing and scaling approaches included those based on raw data, on smoothing the bivariate distribution of the subscores, on smoothing…
Descriptors: Weighted Scores, Scaling, Data Analysis, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ross, Donald C. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
The kappa coefficient and the chi square statistic are used as indices of agreement between two judges' ratings of a set of stimuli on a nominal scale. In this article, the logic of these indices is extended to weighted multi-way cases. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Nouns, Weighted Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Govindarajulu, Z. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1988
Four methods for combining several scores of tests given the same individual are discussed: (1) weighted standardized scores; (2) percentile rank methods; (3) the principal components approach; and (4) the optimal weights method. The optimal weights method is recommended because of its simplicity. (SLD)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Scores, Statistical Analysis, Weighted Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thomas, Charles R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1985
A rational approach to standard transformed scores which always results in the numerical to letter grade correspondence for any chosen hypothetical grade distribution model is developed. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Scoring Formulas, Transformations (Mathematics), Weighted Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vegelius, Jan – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
The G index of agreement does not permit the use of various weights for its various items. The weighted G index described here, make it possible to use unequal weights. An example of the procedure is provided. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Correlation, Item Analysis, Multidimensional Scaling, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clark, William H.; Margolis, Bruce L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Biographical Inventories, Data Analysis, Item Analysis, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Echternacht, Gary – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975
Estimates for the variances of empirically determined scoring weights are given. It is also shown that test item writers should write distractors that discriminate on the criterion variable when this type of scoring is used. (Author)
Descriptors: Scoring, Statistical Analysis, Test Construction, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hakstian, A. Ralph – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
Descriptors: Mathematical Models, Measurement Techniques, Orthogonal Rotation, Tables (Data)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedland, David L.; Michael, William B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
A sample of 153 male police officers were subjects in a test validation study with two objectives: (1) to compare reliability estimates of a 16-item objective achievement examination scored by the conventional items right formula and by four different procedures; and (2) to obtain comparative concurrent validity coefficients of scores arising from…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Concurrent Validity, Correlation, Police
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bejar, Issac I.; Weiss, David J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
The reliabilities yielded by several differential option weighting scoring procedures were compared among themselves as well as against conventional testing. It was found that increases in reliability due to differential option weighting were a function of inter-item correlations. Suggestions for the implementation of differential option weighting…
Descriptors: Correlation, Forced Choice Technique, Item Analysis, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gardner, Robert C.; Erdle, Stephen – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986
This article evaluated criticisms by Stevens and Aleamoni (1986) of an article by Gardner and Erdle (1984) on aggregation using either raw or standard scores. It was demonstrated that their criticisms were unfounded. (Author)
Descriptors: Correlation, Factor Analysis, Raw Scores, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schmidt, Frank L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Multiple Regression Analysis, Predictor Variables, Psychology, Raw Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lenke, Joanne M.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Algebra, Geometry, Grade 8, Predictive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Aamodt, Michael G.; Pierce, Walter L., Jr. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
Data from five separate samples were weighted using the vertical percent method (England) and the rare response method (Telenson, Alexander, and Barrett) to investigate their relative effectiveness for scoring biographical information blanks. Vertical percent scoring yielded significant validity coefficients for all samples, while rare response…
Descriptors: Biographical Inventories, Employees, Job Performance, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lu, K. H. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Classification, Measurement Techniques, Rating Scales
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3