NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sean Joo; Montserrat Valdivia; Dubravka Svetina Valdivia; Leslie Rutkowski – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2024
Evaluating scale comparability in international large-scale assessments depends on measurement invariance (MI). The root mean square deviation (RMSD) is a standard method for establishing MI in several programs, such as the Programme for International Student Assessment and the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies.…
Descriptors: International Assessment, Monte Carlo Methods, Statistical Studies, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ramsay, James; Wiberg, Marie; Li, Juan – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2020
Ramsay and Wiberg used a new version of item response theory that represents test performance over nonnegative closed intervals such as [0, 100] or [0, n] and demonstrated that optimal scoring of binary test data yielded substantial improvements in point-wise root-mean-squared error and bias over number right or sum scoring. We extend these…
Descriptors: Scoring, Weighted Scores, Item Response Theory, Intervals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Grabovsky, Irina; Wainer, Howard – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2017
In this article, we extend the methodology of the Cut-Score Operating Function that we introduced previously and apply it to a testing scenario with multiple independent components and different testing policies. We derive analytically the overall classification error rate for a test battery under the policy when several retakes are allowed for…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Weighted Scores, Classification, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haberman, Shelby J. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2015
Adjustment by minimum discriminant information provides an approach to linking test forms in the case of a nonequivalent groups design with no satisfactory common items. This approach employs background information on individual examinees in each administration so that weighted samples of examinees form pseudo-equivalent groups in the sense that…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Statistical Analysis, Tests, Weighted Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Longford, Nicholas T. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2015
An equating procedure for a testing program with evolving distribution of examinee profiles is developed. No anchor is available because the original scoring scheme was based on expert judgment of the item difficulties. Pairs of examinees from two administrations are formed by matching on coarsened propensity scores derived from a set of…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Testing Programs, College Entrance Examinations, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guanglei Hong; Jonah Deutsch; Heather D. Hill – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2015
Conventional methods for mediation analysis generate biased results when the mediator--outcome relationship depends on the treatment condition. This article shows how the ratio-of-mediator-probability weighting (RMPW) method can be used to decompose total effects into natural direct and indirect effects in the presence of treatment-by-mediator…
Descriptors: Weighted Scores, Probability, Statistical Analysis, Interaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tao, Jian; Shi, Ning-Zhong; Chang, Hua-Hua – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2012
For mixed-type tests composed of both dichotomous and polytomous items, polytomous items often yield more information than dichotomous ones. To reflect the difference between the two types of items, polytomous items are usually pre-assigned with larger weights. We propose an item-weighted likelihood method to better assess examinees' ability…
Descriptors: Test Items, Weighted Scores, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Statistical Bias