Descriptor
Paired Associate Learning | 5 |
Pictorial Stimuli | 5 |
Word Lists | 5 |
Tables (Data) | 4 |
Psychological Studies | 3 |
Children | 2 |
Recall (Psychology) | 2 |
Research Methodology | 2 |
Adults | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Cues | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ackerman, Brian P. | 1 |
Bass, Doris | 1 |
Lipsitt, Lewis P. | 1 |
Nelson, Douglas L. | 1 |
Parker, Janat Fraser | 1 |
Sims-Knight, Judith E. | 1 |
Wicker, Frank W. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Parker, Janat Fraser; Bass, Doris – American Journal of Psychology, 1975
The purpose of this study was to determine if stimuli of high potential imagery (pictures) would be less subject to negative transfer than stimuli of lower potential imagery (concrete words). (Editor)
Descriptors: Paired Associate Learning, Pictorial Stimuli, Psychological Studies, Research Methodology

Wicker, Frank W.; And Others – American Journal of Psychology, 1973
The initial concern of these studies was with the superiority of pictures over corresponding words as stimuli in paired associate learning. (Author)
Descriptors: Paired Associate Learning, Pictorial Stimuli, Psychological Studies, Recall (Psychology)
Nelson, Douglas L.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
The purpose of this experiment was to determine if the verbal system is involved in coding pictorial reresentations when the task requires the acquisition of their relative order. (Author)
Descriptors: Memory, Paired Associate Learning, Pictorial Stimuli, Psychological Studies
Sims-Knight, Judith E.; Lipsitt, Lewis P. – Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974
The present study attempted to determine whether young children can make implicit chains involving images and words. (Author)
Descriptors: Children, Eidetic Imagery, Experimental Psychology, Paired Associate Learning

Ackerman, Brian P. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1985
Second-graders, fifth-graders, and adults participated in an experiment of cued recall for cue-target picture and word pairs. Results suggested that differences in the encoding of both specific and categorical attribute information contribute to developmental recall differences independently of encoding intent and stimulus modality. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Children, Cues