Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Profiles | 2 |
| Word Processing | 2 |
| Academic Discourse | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Cognitive Tests | 1 |
| College Programs | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Educational Benefits | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Written Communication | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Digit Span Test | 1 |
| Wechsler Adult Intelligence… | 1 |
| Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVan Der Steen, Steffie; Samuelson, Dianne; Thomson, Jennifer M. – Written Communication, 2017
This study addresses the current debate about the beneficial effects of text processing software on students with different working memory (WM) during the process of academic writing, especially with regard to the ability to display higher-level conceptual thinking. A total of 54 graduate students (15 male, 39 female) wrote one essay by hand and…
Descriptors: Word Processing, Keyboarding (Data Entry), Writing (Composition), Educational Benefits
Download full textEisenberg, Nora, Ed. – 1989
This report contains profiles of computer-based writing programs at 49 colleges which were originally submitted for empirical assessment by a 3-year project sponsored by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education and the City University of New York. The profiles, representing two-year and four-year, public and private, rural and…
Descriptors: College Programs, Higher Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Microcomputers
