Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Language Processing | 3 |
| Phoneme Grapheme… | 3 |
| Word Recognition | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Phonology | 2 |
| Spelling | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| Graphemes | 1 |
| Inhibition | 1 |
| Interference (Language) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Memory and Language | 3 |
Author
| Andrews, Sally | 1 |
| Bond, Rachel | 1 |
| Frost, Ram | 1 |
| Holyk, Gregory G. | 1 |
| Pexman, Penny M. | 1 |
| Trew, Jennifer L. | 1 |
| Velan, Hadas | 1 |
| Woollams, Anna | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVelan, Hadas; Frost, Ram – Journal of Memory and Language, 2009
We examined the effects of letter-transposition in Hebrew in three masked-priming experiments. Hebrew, like English has an alphabetic orthography where sequential and contiguous letter strings represent phonemes. However, being a Semitic language it has a non-concatenated morphology that is based on root derivations. Experiment 1 showed that…
Descriptors: Semitic Languages, Phonemes, Morphemes, Inhibition
Andrews, Sally; Woollams, Anna; Bond, Rachel – Journal of Memory and Language, 2005
Two experiments investigated naming performance for items with and without digraphs. Both experiments compared performance for Regular Consistent, Regular Inconsistent and Exception words. Experiment 1 also compared nonwords with Non-Existent Bodies to those with existing Consistent and Inconsistent Bodies. Naming was slower for nonwords…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Word Recognition, Phoneme Grapheme Correspondence, Graphemes
Pexman, Penny M.; Trew, Jennifer L.; Holyk, Gregory G. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2005
The process of naming an exception word prime (e.g., PINT) delays subsequent naming of a nonrhyming regular-inconsistent word body neighbor target (e.g., TINT). Both an activation account (Taraban & McClelland, 1987) and a learning account (Burt & Humphreys, 1993) have been offered to explain this interference effect. We investigated how long…
Descriptors: Phoneme Grapheme Correspondence, Phonology, Cognitive Processes, Interference (Language)
