Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Structures | 2 |
| Language Processing | 2 |
| Word Recognition | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Articulation (Speech) | 1 |
| Causal Models | 1 |
| Child Language | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Comprehension | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Developmental Stages | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Farrar, Michael Jeffrey | 1 |
| Hahne, Anja | 1 |
| Hoffmann, Stefanie | 1 |
| Jescheniak, Jorg D. | 1 |
| Tomasello, Michael | 1 |
| Wagner, Valentin | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkJescheniak, Jorg D.; Hahne, Anja; Hoffmann, Stefanie; Wagner, Valentin – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006
There is a long-standing debate in the area of speech production on the question of whether only words selected for articulation are phonologically activated (as maintained by serial-discrete models) or whether this is also true for their semantic competitors (as maintained by forward-cascading and interactive models). Past research has addressed…
Descriptors: Phonology, Articulation (Speech), Semantics, Language Processing
Peer reviewedTomasello, Michael; Farrar, Michael Jeffrey – Journal of Child Language, 1986
Describes a lexical training program developed to teach object, visible movement, and invisible movement words to children at stage 5 (N=7) and stage 6 (N=16) object permanence development. Stage 6 children learned all three types of words equally well, while stage 5 children learned object and visible movement but not invisible movement words.…
Descriptors: Child Language, Cognitive Processes, Cognitive Structures, Comprehension
