Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Experimental Psychology | 3 |
Visual Discrimination | 3 |
Word Recognition | 3 |
Brain | 2 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Visual Stimuli | 2 |
Abstract Reasoning | 1 |
Attention | 1 |
Brain Hemisphere Functions | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Color | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Allen, Philip A. | 1 |
Amrhein, Paul C. | 1 |
Brennen, Tim | 1 |
Cornett, Logan | 1 |
Goodin, Zachary | 1 |
Laeng, Bruno | 1 |
Lien, Mei-Ching | 1 |
Ruthruff, Eric | 1 |
Theios, John | 1 |
Torstein, Lag | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lien, Mei-Ching; Ruthruff, Eric; Cornett, Logan; Goodin, Zachary; Allen, Philip A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2008
The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to determine the degree to which people can process words while devoting central attention to another task. Experiments 1-4 measured the N400 effect, which is sensitive to the degree of mismatch between a word and the current semantic context. Experiment 5 measured the P3 difference between…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Cognitive Processes, Visual Stimuli, Brain Hemisphere Functions
Laeng, Bruno; Torstein, Lag; Brennen, Tim – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2005
Sensory or input factors can influence the strength of interference in the classic Stroop color-word task. Specifically, in a single-trial computerized version of the Stroop task, when color-word pairs were incongruent, opponent color pairs (e.g., the word BLUE in yellow) showed reduced Stroop interference compared with nonopponent color pairs…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Color, Computer Simulation, Word Recognition

Theios, John; Amrhein, Paul C. – Psychological Review, 1989
A theory for the visual and cognitive processing, which accounts for slower naming of pictures than reading of words, is introduced. Two experiments assessed the differences distinguishing word reading and picture naming, using 58 undergraduates. The coding of the mind is neither intrinsically linguistic nor imagistic; it is abstract. (TJH)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Cognitive Processes, Concept Formation, Experimental Psychology