Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Notetaking | 1 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 1 |
| Schemata (Cognition) | 1 |
| Undergraduate Students | 1 |
| Writing (Composition) | 1 |
| Writing Ability | 1 |
| Writing Across the Curriculum | 1 |
| Writing Assignments | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
Author
| Arnold, Kathleen M. | 1 |
| Marsh, Elizabeth J. | 1 |
| McDaniel, Mark A. | 1 |
| Riley, Walter B. | 1 |
| Thio, Kara | 1 |
| Umanath, Sharda | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Missouri (Saint Louis) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textArnold, Kathleen M.; Umanath, Sharda; Thio, Kara; Riley, Walter B.; McDaniel, Mark A.; Marsh, Elizabeth J. – Grantee Submission, 2017
Writing is often used as a tool for learning. However, empirical support for the benefits of writing-to-learn is mixed, likely because the literature conflates diverse activities (e.g., summaries, term papers) under the single umbrella of writing-to-learn. Following recent trends in the writing-to-learn literature, we focus on the underlying…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Writing (Composition), Writing Across the Curriculum, Writing Assignments
