NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 25 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de Krom, Guus – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
The importance of language in the learning process of students has been studied extensively. However, little attention has been paid to the role language plays in the assessment of student writings. Students and instructors at a liberal arts and sciences college were interviewed to reveal their approaches to written assignments. The aim was to…
Descriptors: Writing Strategies, Writing Assignments, College Students, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cheong, Choo Mui; Luo, Na; Zhu, Xinhua; Lu, Qi; Wei, Wei – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Self-assessment is believed to complement peer assessment in the classroom. However, whether, how and why this is done remains unclear. This study, by investigating the combined use of self and peer assessment for an academic writing task among a group of undergraduate students in Hong Kong, aims to shed light on how self-assessment complements…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Academic Language, Writing Assignments, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dawson, Phillip; Sutherland-Smith, Wendy; Ricksen, Mark – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
Contract cheating happens when students outsource their assessed work to a third party. One approach that has been suggested for improving contract cheating detection is comparing students' assignment submissions with their previous work, the rationale being that changes in style may indicate a piece of work has been written by somebody else. This…
Descriptors: Cheating, Identification, Accuracy, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zong, Zheng; Schunn, Christian D.; Wang, Yanqing – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2021
Peer review is regularly found to be a powerful and efficient technique for assessment and feedback, but many students are inexperienced and sometimes struggle to provide meaningful feedback. It is considered best practice to provide students with some training on how to be a good reviewer, but few classes can afford to devote much time to such…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Writing Assignments, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sotardi, Valerie; Dutton, Hilary – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
In this study, we sought to understand assessment-related attitudes and authentic experiences of evaluation anxiety with a sample of first-year university students. We focused on identifying: (a) why students had reported high levels of anxiety on a recent, grade-bearing assessment, and (b) how their attitudes toward assessment type and weighting…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Student Experience, Anxiety, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Liu, Chunhong; Yu, Shulin – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
Following a sociocultural perspective, this vignette-based study explored Chinese master's students' emotions and emotion-regulation strategies in supervisor writing feedback situations. An instrument contained 17 vignettes was developed, validated and administered among 189 participants. Individual interviews with five participants were also…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Masters Programs, Graduate Students, Supervisor Supervisee Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Van Heerden, Martina – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
Research has shown that written feedback is important for student learning and development. However, the messages embedded in feedback may lead to students being misled about what they need to learn or how they need to develop. This article reports on a small-scale investigation into the messages embedded in feedback. Legitimation Code Theory was…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Instructional Effectiveness, Content Analysis, College Freshmen
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guasch, Teresa; Espasa, Anna; Martinez-Melo, Montserrat – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
Research on feedback has focused more on generating feedback rather than on how students use it and implement it; that is, what type of cognitive, metacognitive or affective activity students engage in once they have received feedback. In order to visualize feedback use and implementation, a quasi-experimental study was carried out. Students were…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Writing Assignments, Collaborative Writing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Yongyan; Hu, Guangwei – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
Teachers' instructional practices surrounding written assignments have been little researched, despite writing remaining the primary means of assessment in higher education, including postgraduate professional development programmes. In this paper, we report a study that explored what a sample of lecturers in a Master of Education programme at an…
Descriptors: Writing Assignments, Writing Instruction, Graduate Students, Masters Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dijks, Monique A.; Brummer, Leonie; Kostons, Danny – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
Peer feedback often has positive effects on student learning processes and outcomes. However, students may not always be honest when giving and receiving peer feedback as they are likely to be biased due to peer relations, peer characteristics and personal preferences. To alleviate these biases, anonymous peer feedback was investigated in the…
Descriptors: Peer Relationship, Feedback (Response), Higher Education, Expertise
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Day, Indira N. Z.; van Blankenstein, Floris M.; Westenberg, Michiel; Admiraal, Wilfried – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
In-course assessment, such as midterms, quizzes or presentations, is often an integral part of higher education courses. These so-called intermediate assessments influence students' final grades. The current review investigates which characteristics of intermediate assessment relate to these grades. In total, 88 articles were reviewed that…
Descriptors: Correlation, Foreign Countries, Grades (Scholastic), Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Borton, Kelley; Anderson, Olivia S. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
Peer evaluation provides an opportunity to give and receive feedback on work in a structured setting. Instructors can utilise peer evaluation as an opportunity to teach and for students to practice metacognition along with other professional skills. Second year Master of Public Health students in a professional development capstone course…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Metacognition, Portfolios (Background Materials), Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jones, Michael; Sheridan, Lynnaire – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2015
Advances have been made in detecting and deterring the student plagiarism that has accompanied the uptake and development of the internet. Many authors from the late 1990s onwards grappled with plagiarism in the digital age, presenting articles that were provoking and established the foundation for strategies to address cyber plagiarism, including…
Descriptors: Cheating, Plagiarism, Student Behavior, Internet
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Knight, Simon; Leigh, Andy; Davila, Yvonne C.; Martin, Leigh J.; Krix, Daniel W. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
In calibration tasks students assess exemplar texts using criteria against which their own work will be assessed. Typically, these tasks are used in the context of training for peer assessment. Little research has been conducted on the benefits of calibration tasks, such as benchmarking, as learning opportunities in their own right. This paper…
Descriptors: Assessment Literacy, Benchmarking, Outcomes of Education, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Newton, Philip – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2016
Establishing a positive, proactive approach to issues such as plagiarism requires that students are equipped with the skills and experience to act with integrity, and that educators are fully aware of the attitudes and ability of students, particularly when they start university. This project used a questionnaire-based methodology to probe the…
Descriptors: Integrity, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Undergraduate Students
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2