Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Davila, Yvonne C. | 1 |
| Engelhard, George, Jr. | 1 |
| Henry, Patricia | 1 |
| Knight, Simon | 1 |
| Krix, Daniel W. | 1 |
| Leigh, Andy | 1 |
| Manalo, Jonathan R. | 1 |
| Martin, Leigh J. | 1 |
| Miller, James | 1 |
| Myford, Carol M. | 1 |
| Shaw, Melanie | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKnight, Simon; Leigh, Andy; Davila, Yvonne C.; Martin, Leigh J.; Krix, Daniel W. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
In calibration tasks students assess exemplar texts using criteria against which their own work will be assessed. Typically, these tasks are used in the context of training for peer assessment. Little research has been conducted on the benefits of calibration tasks, such as benchmarking, as learning opportunities in their own right. This paper…
Descriptors: Assessment Literacy, Benchmarking, Outcomes of Education, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Walters, Kelley Jo; Henry, Patricia; Vinella, Michael; Wells, Steve; Shaw, Melanie; Miller, James – International Journal on E-Learning, 2015
Providing transparent written feedback to doctoral students is essential to the learning process and preparation for the capstone. The purpose of this study was to conduct a qualitative exploration of faculty feedback on benchmark written assignments across multiple, online doctoral programs. The Corpus for this analysis included 236 doctoral…
Descriptors: Computational Linguistics, Feedback (Response), Graduate Students, College Faculty
Download full textWolfe, Edward W.; Myford, Carol M.; Engelhard, George, Jr.; Manalo, Jonathan R. – College Board, 2007
In this study, we investigated a variety of Reader effects that may influence the validity of ratings assigned to AP® English Literature and Composition essays. Specifically, we investigated whether Readers exhibit changes in their levels of severity and accuracy, and their use of individual scale categories over time. We refer to changes in these…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, Essays, English Literature, Writing (Composition)
