NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
College Composition and…98
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 98 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chris W. Gallagher Ed. – College Composition and Communication, 2019
This symposium enacts a debate over a high-stakes question for writing studies: How does standardization within and across writing programs enable or constrain our democratic aspirations? It includes: (1) "Everything-but-the-Kitchen-Sink Assessment " (Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein); (2) "Assessment, Coherence, and…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Democracy, Standards, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Timothy Oleksiak – College Composition and Communication, 2020
If, as I argue, student-to-student peer review is animated by "improvement imperatives" that make peer review a form of what Lauren Berlant calls "cruel optimism," then rhetoric and composition will need to imagine theories and structures for peer review that do not repeat cruel attachments. I offer slow peer review as a…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Writing (Composition), Writing Assignments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anne Ruggles Gere; Anne Curzan; J. W. Hammond; Sarah Hughes; Ruth Li; Andrew Moos; Kendon Smith; Kathryn Van Zanen; Kelly L. Wheeler; Crystal J. Zanders – College Composition and Communication, 2021
Critical language awareness offers one approach to communal "justicing," an iterative and collective process that can address inequities in the disciplinary infrastructure of Writing Studies. We demonstrate justicing in the field's pasts, policies, and publications; offer a model of communal revision; and invite readers to become agents…
Descriptors: Metalinguistics, Writing Instruction, Writing (Composition), Justice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tyler S. Branson; James Chase Sanchez; Sarah Ruffing Robbins; Catherine M. Wehlburg – College Composition and Communication, 2017
This essay reports on a writing-based formative assessment of a university-wide initiative to enhance students' global learning. Our mixed (and unanticipated) results show the need for enhanced expertise in writing assessment as well as for sustained partnerships among diverse institutional stakeholders so that public programming--from events…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, College Students, Global Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Heather Lindenman; Martin Camper; Lindsay Dunne Jacoby; Jessica Enoch – College Composition and Communication, 2018
This essay brings to light new evidence about the relationship between revision and reflective writing in the first-year writing classroom. Based on a robust study of student work, we illuminate a variety of complex relationships between the writing knowledge that students articulate in their reflections--including how they narrate their course…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Writing Instruction, Revision (Written Composition), Reflection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mary Soliday; Jennifer Seibel Trainor – College Composition and Communication, 2016
Drawing from a large qualitative study, we examine how students experience writing in college, focusing on the conditions that allow students to develop their authorship and those that encourage students to experience writing as a process of following rules and regulations. We situate students' perceptions, and the assignments and practices that…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Attitudes, Writing (Composition), Writing Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Denise K. Comer; Edward M. White – College Composition and Communication, 2016
This article shares our experience designing and deploying writing assessment in English Composition I: Achieving Expertise, the first-ever first-year writing Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). We argue that writing assessment can be effectively adapted to the MOOC environment, and that doing so reaffirms the importance of mixed-methods approaches…
Descriptors: MOOCs, Writing Evaluation, Barriers, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scott, Tony; Brannon, Lil – College Composition and Communication, 2013
This article draws on qualitative research conducted as a part of a writing program assessment to examine the relationship between assessment, valuation, and the economics of first-year writing. It argues that the terms of labor in first-year writing complicate practices of valuation and the processes of consensus building that have become common…
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Writing Evaluation, Power Structure, Values
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gere, Anne Ruggles; Aull, Laura; Escudero, Moises Damian Perales; Lancaster, Zak; Lei, Elizabeth Vander – College Composition and Communication, 2013
Grounded in the principle that writing assessment should be locally developed and controlled, this article describes a study that contextualizes and validates the decisions that students make in the modified Directed Self-Placement (DSP) process used at the University of Michigan. The authors present results of a detailed text analysis of…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Student Placement, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mya Poe; Norbert Elliot; John Aloysius Cogan; Tito G. Nurudeen – College Composition and Communication, 2014
In this article, we investigate disparate impact analysis as a validation tool for understanding the local effects of writing assessment on diverse groups of students. Using a case study data set from a university that we call Brick City University, we explain how Brick City's writing program undertook a self-study of its placement exam using the…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Student Placement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallagher, Chris W. – College Composition and Communication, 2011
I use Burkean analysis to show how neoliberalism undermines faculty assessment expertise and underwrites testing industry expertise in the current assessment scene. Contending that we cannot extricate ourselves from our limited agency in this scene until we abandon the familiar "stakeholder" theory of power, I propose a rewriting of the…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, College Faculty, Political Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cosgrove, Cornelius – College Composition and Communication, 2010
This article argues for and models an approach to writing program assessment that relies on study of the writing practices of program graduates as a way to inform revisions in curriculum and teaching practices. The article also examines how conducting such assessments can help nondisciplinary publics understand the nature of composition …
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, College Graduates, Program Effectiveness, Educational Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pagano, Neil; Bernhardt, Stephen A.; Reynolds, Dudley; Williams, Mark; McCurrie, Matthew Kilian – College Composition and Communication, 2008
In a FIPSE-funded assessment project, a group of diverse institutions collaborated on developing a common, course-embedded approach to assessing student writing in our first-year writing programs. The results of this assessment project, the processes we developed to assess authentic student writing, and individual institutional perspectives are…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Program Effectiveness, Freshman Composition, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Raymond, James C. – College Composition and Communication, 1982
Discusses the lack of professional agreement as to which components of writing should be evaluated and how. Offers eight suggestions as guidelines for writing evaluation. (HTH)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
College Composition and Communication, 1984
Presents a response refuting Leonard Moskovit's essay on the use and misuse of the referent "this," arguing that his analysis of 28 examples and resulting principles for evaluating broad referents are in error. Includes Moskovit's defense of his essay. (HTH)
Descriptors: Grammar, Linguistic Theory, Linguistics, Pronouns
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7