NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing 1 to 15 of 102 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang Jiang; Beata Beigman Klebanov; Jiangang Hao; Paul Deane; Oren E. Livne – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Writing is integral to educational success at all levels and to success in the workplace. However, low literacy is a global challenge, and many students lack sufficient skills to be good writers. With the rapid advance of technology, computer-based tools that provide automated feedback are being increasingly developed. However, mixed…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Middle School Students, High School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ruth Li – Thresholds in Education, 2025
In this article, I introduce a collaborative annotation activity that supports students in critically examining AI-generated writing in relation to criteria including specificity and complexity. I engage students in collaboratively annotating the AI-generated essays, guiding students to identify instances in which the essays could be more…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Computer Assisted Instruction, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shujun Liu; Azzeddine Boudouaia; Xinya Chen; Yan Li – Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2025
The application of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) has recently gained researchers' attention worldwide. However, the impact of AWE feedback on student writing, particularly in languages other than English, remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the impacts of Chinese AWE feedback and teacher feedback on Chinese writing revision,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Middle School Students, Grade 7, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Qiufang Zheng – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2025
In the context of process-oriented writing instruction, the significance of engaging students in draft revision is widely acknowledged (McGarrell and Verbeem, ELT Journal 61:228-236, 2007). Nevertheless, L2 learners often exhibit limited motivation for writing, leading to inadequate revision efforts. This quasi-experimental study investigates the…
Descriptors: Technology Uses in Education, Computer Assisted Instruction, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Esma Senel – Journal of Learning for Development, 2025
Whether dealing with their native or a foreign language, both teachers and students have consistently found writing skills to be difficult to achieve. Students are concerned about initiating and structuring their thoughts, while teachers struggle to inspire their students to improve their writing capabilities. Hence, this experimental study…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, College Faculty, Writing (Composition)
Hillary Greene Nolan; Merijke Coenraad; Viki Young – Digital Promise, 2024
This study investigates how teachers understand and position AI tools in middle school writing instruction, drawing on 27 teacher interviews collected during a study called Project Topeka that used an interactive argumentative writing platform with AI-generated scores and feedback. Based on the interviews, we generate an initial theoretical…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Computer Assisted Instruction, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Uses in Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Stephen Foster; Denise Whitelock; Simon Cross; Karen Kear – Prism: Casting New Light on Learning, Theory & Practice, 2022
"OpenEssayist" is an automated writing evaluation system (AWE) designed to provide immediate textual and graphical feedback to students to help them improve their academic writing. One of the graphical visualisations as part of "OpenEssayist," (named a 'rainbow diagram'), illustrates how well the key concepts within the writing…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Doctoral Students, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Saadet Korucu-Kis – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2025
Although a number of studies examined the use of social networking sites (SNSs) in academic writing instruction, these studies mainly revolve around social media centered on microblogging features. Despite living in a visually dominated world, the potential of visual social media such as Instagram whereby the textual, the visual and the social can…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction, Visual Aids, Social Media
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mazhar Bal; Emre Öztürk – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between technology-supported writing instruction at the K-12 level and deep learning approaches and to understand the trends in this field. In the study, 12 articles selected from Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC and EBSCO databases were systematically analysed. The findings reveal that the…
Descriptors: Learning Processes, Writing Processes, Writing Skills, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Benali, Ameni – English Language Teaching, 2021
It is undeniable that attempts to develop automated feedback systems that support and enhance language learning and assessment have increased in the last few years. The growing demand for using technology in the classroom and the promotions provided by automated- written-feedback program developers and designers, drive many educational…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction, Feedback (Response), English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Masoud Rahimi; Jalil Fathi; Di Zou – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Grounded in the activity theory, we adopted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach to explore the impact of automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners' academic writing skills (i.e. task achievement, coherence and cohesion, lexicon, and grammatical range and accuracy). To this end, two…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Language Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Giang Thi Linh Hoang; Neomy Storch – Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2024
Research has suggested that the type of feedback learners receive can impact on whether learners understand the feedback, the extent to which they engage with it, and whether they incorporate it in their revised drafts. However, to date, only a small number of studies have investigated learner engagement with corrective feedback provided by…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Language Processing, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hassanzadeh, Mohammad; Fotoohnejad, Samira – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2021
Considering the prominence attached to written corrective feedback (WCF) within the domain of second/foreign language (L2) acquisition, automated writing evaluation (AWE) tools have steadily gained ground over the last two decades. The current study was an attempt to investigate the extent incorporating an AWE program, known as Criterion®, within…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shireen Jamal Mohammed; Maryam Waleed Khalid – Language Testing in Asia, 2025
While over the last couple of years, there has been a growing investigation into the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within language learning, very little has been written regarding how such AI feedback influences the complex experiences of EFL learners in terms of motivation, foreign language peace of mind (FLPoM), trait emotional…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Feedback (Response), Computer Software, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yasuyo Sawaki; Yutaka Ishii; Hiroaki Yamada; Takenobu Tokunaga – Language Testing in Asia, 2024
The present paper provides an overview of an online module for formative assessment of summary writing skills for second language (L2) introductory academic writing instruction in Japan and presents initial empirical results on how Japanese undergraduate students' summary writing performance changed with a series of automated summary content…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Language Usage, Task Analysis
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7