NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 20011
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 560 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Michelle Sonnenberg; Carolyn Gubala; Justiss Burry; Jessica Griffith; Tanya Zarlengo; Lisa Melonçon – Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2024
We use a continuous improvement model to evaluate an information design assignment by analyzing 120 student drafts and finals alongside instructor feedback. Using data from across sections (N = 118), we illustrate a process focused on improving student learning that other technical and professional communication program administrators and faculty…
Descriptors: Assignments, Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Han Zhang; Jamie Costley; Matthew Courtney; Galina Shulgina; Mik Fanguy – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
Depending on the nature of comments made during peer review of academic writing, students may be able to evaluate and revise their performance. Therefore, it is essential to explore how the content of comments affects student writing. Since peer review is a process of interaction, it is critical to understand how comments affect student academic…
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Content Area Writing, Academic Language, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jussi S. Jauhiainen; Agustin Bernardo Garagorry Guerra – Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 2025
Aim/Purpose: This article investigates the process of identifying and correcting hallucinations in ChatGPT-4's recall of student-written responses as well as its evaluation of these responses, and provision of feedback. Effective prompting is examined to enhance the pre-evaluation, evaluation, and post-evaluation stages. Background: Advanced Large…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lifang Bai; Yijia Wei – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2024
ChatGPT can promptly reformulate a text and improve its quality in content and form while preserving the original meaning. Yet, little is known about how learners respond to such reformulations. Here, we employed a three-stage writing task (composing-comparison-rewriting) to investigate how learners notice, integrate, and perceive ChatGPT's…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Writing Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Galina Shulgina; Jamie Costley; Irina Shcheglova; Han Zhang; Natalya Sedova – Smart Learning Environments, 2024
While peer-editing is considered an important part of developing students' academic writing, questions remain about how different types of peer-editing affect subsequent student performance. The present study looked at a group of university students (N = 149) engaged in peer editing of one another's essays in an online security studies course. The…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Editing, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
AL Harrasi, Kothar Talib Sulaiman – Language Testing in Asia, 2023
Drawing upon research on the ways texts work as communication across different disciplines, this study investigated teacher and student feedback practices on three different patterns of writing: comparison-contrast essays, opinion essays, and cause-and-effect essays. The data were collected through three qualitative techniques: interviews, class…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Rhetoric, Essays
Roach, Susan J. – ProQuest LLC, 2023
This case study investigated first-year composition students' perceptions of instructors' written feedback. Participants reported on their understanding of the role of feedback, how they processed feedback, and if and how they used it. Thirty-one participants completed a short online survey; the responses were analyzed to identify students who…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Freshman Composition, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Loo, Daron B.; Imperia, Rowland Anthony – International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2022
Despite the growing movement to embrace sociomaterial approaches to feedback practices (e.g. Gravett, 2020), dialogicity remains the prominent and dominant approach, especially in the teaching of introductory or compulsory writing courses at the tertiary level. To examine this in our own practice, we reflected on and compared our written…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Higher Education
Matthew Whelihan – ProQuest LLC, 2022
This dissertation compares the impact of instructor screencast feedback and instructor written feedback on the writing of college students in freshman composition courses. A mixed methods study was used to assess the level of improvement between drafts of essays, the final scores of essays, and the level of improvement over time for both types of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Written Language, Freshman Composition, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ima Fitriyah; Ary Setya Budhi Ningrum; Imelda Gozali – International Journal of Language Testing, 2024
Written corrective feedback (WCF) becomes an essential part of students writing development. The efficacy of WCF for EFL learners has been the subject of numerous studies. However, the studies neglected the idea of the feedback literacy. Thus, this study aimed to investigate how two English teachers provide WCF, what students expect from their…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), Writing Evaluation, Expectation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jessie S. Barrot – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
This bibliometric analysis attempts to map out the scientific literature on automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems for teaching, learning, and assessment. A total of 170 documents published between 2002 and 2021 in Social Sciences Citation Index journals were reviewed from four dimensions, namely size (productivity and citations), time…
Descriptors: Educational Trends, Automation, Computer Assisted Testing, Writing Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yu Zhou; Shulin Yu; Peisha Wu – RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2024
While a plethora of studies have been conducted on corrective feedback in L2 writing, praise as feedback has received less attention in L2 writing despite its well-acknowledged motivating functions in education and psychology (For economy of expression, the word "praise" will be used consistently throughout this paper to denote…
Descriptors: Positive Reinforcement, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Meghan Velez; Zackery Reed; Darryl Chamberlain; Cihan Aydiner – Thresholds in Education, 2025
In fewer than two years, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has transformed the educational experience for both students and faculty. Writing feedback and evaluation tools like MyEssayFeedback, EssayGrader, and Markr have been released with the promise that faculty will be able to focus more on teaching than simply grading. However, the…
Descriptors: Writing Across the Curriculum, Artificial Intelligence, Feedback (Response), Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yang Jiang; Beata Beigman Klebanov; Jiangang Hao; Paul Deane; Oren E. Livne – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025
Background: Writing is integral to educational success at all levels and to success in the workplace. However, low literacy is a global challenge, and many students lack sufficient skills to be good writers. With the rapid advance of technology, computer-based tools that provide automated feedback are being increasingly developed. However, mixed…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Middle School Students, High School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhu, Wenlei; Yu, Shulin; Zheng, Yao – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
From a positive psychology perspective, this case study explores learners' academic emotions in giving and receiving peer feedback on second language writing and the possible influences of emotions on learners' uptake of peer feedback. The data were collected from five undergraduates at a Chinese university, including semi-structured interviews,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, Emotional Response
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  38