NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)6
Since 2006 (last 20 years)9
Audience
Teachers2
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Reed, Terry L. – ProQuest LLC, 2018
This study examined how student's scores vary on two different writing assignments, what were the student's perceptions, and any correlations that may arise from the use of two different methods of providing formative feedback to high school juniors. Many studies support the use of technology and demonstrate how technology plays a significant role…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Evaluation, Writing Assignments, Formative Evaluation
Nebraska Department of Education, 2016
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Practice Guide, "Teaching Secondary Students to Write Effectively," offers educators three specific, evidence-based recommendations that address the challenges of teaching students in grades 6-12 to write effectively. This summary focuses on the third of the three recommendations: Use assessments of…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Secondary School Students, Adolescents, Writing Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nguyen, Huy; Xiong, Wenting; Litman, Diane – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2017
A peer-review system that automatically evaluates and provides formative feedback on free-text feedback comments of students was iteratively designed and evaluated in college and high-school classrooms. Classroom assignments required students to write paper drafts and submit them to a peer-review system. When student peers later submitted feedback…
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Computer Mediated Communication, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Herrington, Anne J.; Stassen, Martha L. A. – Across the Disciplines, 2016
In fall 2010, the University of Massachusetts Amherst instituted a new upper-division General Education requirement, the Integrative Experience (IE), designed to help students integrate the various components of their undergraduate experience and reflect upon their learning and development as a result of those experiences, both key dimensions of…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing Across the Curriculum, General Education, Required Courses
Beck, Sarah – Teachers College Press, 2018
The think-aloud approach to classroom writing assessment is designed to expand teachers' perspectives on adolescent students as writers and help them integrate instruction and assessment in a timely way. Emphasizing learning over evaluation, it is especially well-suited to revealing students' strengths and helping them overcome common challenges…
Descriptors: Protocol Analysis, Skill Analysis, Writing Skills, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wingard, Joel; Geosits, Angela – Across the Disciplines, 2014
Although teacher commentary on student papers and students' revisions have been investigated separately, the relationship between commentary and revision has not been much studied. Such a gap in the research leaves the nature of the progression from effective commentary to substantive revision obscure. This article describes a mixed method study,…
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Freshman Composition, Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Huang, Shu-Chen – Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 2016
This paper reports the design of learning-oriented formative assessments in an EFL writing course that involved learners in regularly responding to teacher feedback. Following major assessment and feedback frameworks developed recently, these formative assessments were explicated in three aspects: the scheduling of learning and assessment…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bratkovich, Meghan Odsliv – Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 2014
This study investigated the nature of self-assessment and blind peer- and teacher-assessment in L2 writing. The type of feedback students gave to themselves and peers, the type of feedback used in the revision process, and the source of the feedback used were all analyzed. Additionally, student perceptions of self- and peer-assessment, feedback,…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ferster, Bill; Hammond, Thomas C.; Alexander, R. Curby; Lyman, Hunt – Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 2012
The hurried pace of the modern classroom does not permit formative feedback on writing assignments at the frequency or quality recommended by the research literature. One solution for increasing individual feedback to students is to incorporate some form of computer-generated assessment. This study explores the use of automated assessment of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Scripts, Formative Evaluation, Essays