NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 58 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicole Schutte; Zhandi van Zyl – Perspectives in Education, 2023
In this conceptual paper, borne from the experiences of two academic literacy lecturers at the NWU, we ask, regarding elements of assessment, how we can sensibly adapt an intervention-style writing course in a post-COVID higher education context. We propose a course correction model, applicable to academic literacy writing courses, to address the…
Descriptors: Writing Assignments, Reflection, COVID-19, Pandemics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Traci C. Eshelman – Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 2024
The purpose of this multiple intrinsic case study was to describe how Northeastern United States middle school teachers and students engaged with a new automated writing evaluation tool used to score and provide feedback on extended essay assignments to improve teaching and learning writing. Richard Elmore's (1993) instructional core framework is…
Descriptors: High School Teachers, Learner Engagement, Automation, Writing Evaluation
Michelle Herridge – ProQuest LLC, 2021
Evaluation of student written work during summative assessments is an important and critical task for instructors at all educational levels. Nevertheless, few research studies exist that provide insights into how different instructors approach this task. Chemistry faculty (FIs) and graduate student instructors (GSIs) regularly engage in the…
Descriptors: Science Instruction, Chemistry, College Faculty, Teaching Assistants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Brody, Heather I.; Santos, Jennifer M. – Journal of Instructional Research, 2019
Instructors consistently complain about students not reading or using feedback. To address this issue, the authors designed an in-class feedback exercise. The authors found that when students recognize the importance of feedback on writing assignments, they look forward to getting, reading, and using such feedback, and instructor efficacy…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Written Language, Writing Assignments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Law, Sweety – Higher Education Studies, 2019
Employers have continually indicated that writing instruction is much needed in higher education across all majors. It has become more imperative now than before to better prepare our graduates for professional success in an age of increasing writing necessity, data analytics and reporting, and technical sophistication. Writing assessment in a…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Educational Technology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Patekar, Jakob – Language Testing, 2021
Writing in a foreign language is a particularly difficult skill to develop, especially when young learners are concerned because they are parallelly learning to write in their L1 and do not have strong oral foundations in their L2. The issue becomes even more complex when the ways to assess young learners' writing are considered, given that…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Test Construction, Foreign Countries, Oral Language
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nguyen, Huy; Xiong, Wenting; Litman, Diane – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2017
A peer-review system that automatically evaluates and provides formative feedback on free-text feedback comments of students was iteratively designed and evaluated in college and high-school classrooms. Classroom assignments required students to write paper drafts and submit them to a peer-review system. When student peers later submitted feedback…
Descriptors: Computer Uses in Education, Computer Mediated Communication, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mellar, Harvey; Peytcheva-Forsyth, Roumiana; Kocdar, Serpil; Karadeniz, Abdulkadir; Yovkova, Blagovesna – International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2018
Student authentication and authorship checking systems are intended to help teachers address cheating and plagiarism. This study set out to investigate higher education teachers' perceptions of the prevalence and types of cheating in their courses with a focus on the possible changes that might come about as a result of an increased use of…
Descriptors: Cheating, Incidence, Integrity, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Patchan, Melissa M.; Schunn, Christian D.; Correnti, Richard J. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016
Although feedback is often seen as a critical component of the learning process, many open questions about how specific feedback features contribute to the effectiveness of feedback remain--especially in regards to peer feedback of writing. Nelson and Schunn (2009) identified several important features of peer feedback in their nature of feedback…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), Regression (Statistics), Student Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Huang, Shu-Chen – Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 2016
This paper reports the design of learning-oriented formative assessments in an EFL writing course that involved learners in regularly responding to teacher feedback. Following major assessment and feedback frameworks developed recently, these formative assessments were explicated in three aspects: the scheduling of learning and assessment…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bernstein, Daniel; Greenhoot, Andrea Follmer – Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 2014
Helping students achieve advanced critical thinking and writing skills in large undergraduate classes is a challenge faced by many university faculty members. We addressed this challenge in a three-year project using team course design, built around a cognitive apprenticeship model, to enhance undergraduates' writing, critical thinking, and…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Writing Instruction, Writing Improvement, Critical Thinking
Dali, Keren; Lau, Andrea; Risk, Kevin – Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 2015
This article makes a case for the inclusion of creative writing in Library & Information Science (LIS) courses. Using an example of the course on reading practices and audiences, it shows how creative writing can contribute to the development of creativity, critical thinking, ability for self-direction and independent learning--all the…
Descriptors: Creative Writing, Library Education, Information Science Education, Creativity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Bratkovich, Meghan Odsliv – Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 2014
This study investigated the nature of self-assessment and blind peer- and teacher-assessment in L2 writing. The type of feedback students gave to themselves and peers, the type of feedback used in the revision process, and the source of the feedback used were all analyzed. Additionally, student perceptions of self- and peer-assessment, feedback,…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bickmore, Lisa; Christiansen, Ron – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 2010
Multimodal writing is considered as a "new" way of composing, or, somewhat cynically, as a strategy for adding relevance or interest to a required composition course. Jody Shipka's "A Multimodal Task-Based Framework for Composing" suggests that "students' uptakes of a much wider, richer repertoire of semiotic resources,…
Descriptors: Freshman Composition, Rhetoric, Writing Assignments, Student Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kaufman, Julia H.; Schunn, Christian D. – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2011
We investigate students' negative perceptions about an online peer assessment system for undergraduate writing across the disciplines. Specifically, we consider the nature of students' resistance to peer assessment; what factors influence that resistance; and how students' perceptions impact their revision work. We do this work by first examining…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Assignments, Student Attitudes, Peer Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4